Literature DB >> 20592614

Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age.

John H Grose1, Sara K Mamo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the processing of temporal fine structure diminishes with age, even in the presence of relatively normal audiometric hearing. Temporal fine structure processing was assessed by measuring the discrimination of interaural phase differences (IPDs). The hypothesis was that IPD discrimination is more acute in middle-aged observers than in older observers but that acuity in middle-aged observers is nevertheless poorer than in young adults.
DESIGN: Two experiments were undertaken. The first measured discrimination of 0- and π-radian interaural phases as a function of carrier frequency. The stimulus was a 5-Hz sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone in which, in the signal waveform, the interaural phase of the carrier was inverted during alternate modulation periods. The second experiment measured IPD discrimination at fixed frequencies. The stimulus was a pair of tone pulses in which, in the signal, the trailing pulse contained an IPD. A total of 39 adults with normal audiograms ≤2000 Hz participated in this study, of which 15 were younger, 12 middle aged, and 12 older.
RESULTS: Experiment 1 showed that the highest carrier frequency at which a π-radian IPD could be discriminated from the diotic, 0-radian standard was significantly lower in middle-aged listeners than young adults, and still lower in older listeners. Experiment 2 indicated that middle-aged listeners were less sensitive to IPDs than young adults at all but the lowest frequencies tested. Older listeners, as a group, had the poorest thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that deficits in temporal fine structure processing are evident in the presenescent auditory system. This adds to the accumulating evidence that deficiencies in some aspects of auditory temporal processing emerge relatively early in the aging process. It is possible that early-emerging temporal processing deficits manifest themselves in challenging speech in noise environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20592614      PMCID: PMC2966515          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e627e7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  28 in total

1.  Mapping lateralization of click trains in younger and older populations.

Authors:  Harvey Babkoff; Chava Muchnik; Nofar Ben-David; Miriam Furst; Shmuel Even-Zohar; Minka Hildesheimer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The effect of interaural delay of the masker on masking-level differences in young and old adults.

Authors:  M K Pichora-Fuller; B A Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Processing interaural cues in sound segregation by young and middle-aged brains.

Authors:  Ilse J A Wambacq; Janet Koehnke; Joan Besing; Laurie L Romei; AnnMarie Depierro; David Cooper
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking.

Authors:  B C Moore; A Sek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sensitivity to interaural temporal disparities of low- and high-frequency neurons in the superior olivary complex. II. Coincidence detection.

Authors:  R Batra; S Kuwada; D C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Discriminations of interaural phase differences.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  J E Rose; J F Brugge; D J Anderson; J E Hind
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Central auditory processing: a view from auditory neuroscience.

Authors:  D P Phillips
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1995-05

10.  Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; P K Robinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  101 in total

1.  Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: individual differences in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-03

2.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Cochlear synaptopathy in acquired sensorineural hearing loss: Manifestations and mechanisms.

Authors:  M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 7.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Competing Speech Perception in Middle Age.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Temporal Processing Deficits in Middle Age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.