Literature DB >> 29953908

Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Jesyin Lai1, Edward L Bartlett2.   

Abstract

Age-related hearing decline typically includes threshold shifts as well as reduced wave I auditory brainstem response (ABR) amplitudes due to cochlear synaptopathy/neuropathy, which may compromise precise coding of suprathreshold speech envelopes. This is supported by findings with older listeners, who have difficulties in envelope and speech processing, especially in noise. However, separating the effects of threshold elevation, synaptopathy, and degradation by noise on physiological representations may be difficult. In the present study, the effects of notched, low- and high-pass noise on envelope-following responses (EFRs) in aging were compared when sound levels (aged: 85-dB SPL; young: 60- to 80-dB SPL) were matched between groups peripherally, by matching wave I ABR amplitudes, or centrally by matching EFR amplitudes. Low-level notched noise reduced EFRs to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones in young animals for notch widths up to 2 octaves. High-pass noise above the carrier frequency reduced EFRs. Young animals showed EFR reductions at lower noise levels. Low-pass noise did not reduce EFRs in either young or aged animals. High-pass noise may affect EFR amplitudes in young animals more than aged by reducing the contributions of high-frequency-sensitive inputs. EFRs to SAM tones in modulated noise (NAM) suggest that neurons of young animals can synchronize to NAM at lower sound levels and maintain dual AM representations better than older animals. The overall results show that EFR amplitudes are strongly influenced by aging and the presence of a competing sound that likely reduces or shifts the pool of responsive neurons.
Copyright © 2018 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age-related hearing loss; amplitude modulation; envelope-following responses; masking; neuropathy; synaptopathy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29953908      PMCID: PMC6076866          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  81 in total

1.  Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Anthony T Herdman; Otavio Lins; Patricia Van Roon; David R Stapells; Michael Scherg; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Ginger S Stickney; Ying-Yee Kong; Michael Vongphoe; Ashish Bhargave; Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Aging and speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Enhancement of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms: role of amplitude envelope and temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Sasha M John; Bruce A Schneider; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  The brainstem auditory evoked response in neurological disease: a review.

Authors:  M J Rowe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Sensorineural hearing loss amplifies neural coding of envelope information in the central auditory system of chinchillas.

Authors:  Ziwei Zhong; Kenneth S Henry; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Kelly L Tremblay; Ananthanarayan R Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory temporal processing in healthy aging: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Peter Sörös; Inga K Teismann; Elisabeth Manemann; Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Auditory Brainstem Response Latency in Noise as a Marker of Cochlear Synaptopathy.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Ann E Hickox; Hari M Bharadwaj; Hannah Goldberg; Sarah Verhulst; M Charles Liberman; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  2 in total

1.  Longitudinal auditory pathophysiology following mild blast-induced trauma.

Authors:  Emily X Han; Joseph M Fernandez; Caitlin Swanberg; Riyi Shi; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 2.  Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response.

Authors:  Emily B J Coffey; Trent Nicol; Travis White-Schwoch; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Robert J Zatorre; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 14.919

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.