Literature DB >> 15179115

Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss.

Emily Buss1, Joseph W Hall, John H Grose.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sensorineural hearing loss on the ability to make use of fine temporal information and to evaluate the relation between this ability and the ability to recognize speech.
DESIGN: Fourteen observers with normal hearing and 12 observers with sensorineural hearing loss were tested on open-set word recognition and on psychophysical tasks thought to reflect use of fine-structure cues: the detection of 2 Hz frequency modulation (FM) and the discrimination of the rate of amplitude modulation (AM) and quasifrequency modulation (QFM).
RESULTS: The results showed relatively poor performance for observers with sensorineural hearing loss on both the speech recognition and psychoacoustical tasks. Of particular interest was the finding of significant correlations within the hearing-loss group between speech recognition performance and the psychoacoustical tasks based on frequency modulation, which are thought to reflect the quality of the coding of temporal fine structure.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that sensorineural hearing loss may be associated with a reduced ability to use fine temporal information that is coded by neural phase-locking to stimulus fine-structure and that this may contribute to poor speech recognition performance and to poor performance on psychoacoustical tasks that depend on temporal fine structure. Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15179115     DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000130796.73809.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  49 in total

1.  The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.

Authors:  Benjamin M Sheffield; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

4.  An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Masood Delfarah; Jordan L Vasko; Brittney L Carter; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Jenna M Browning; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Discrimination of time-reversed harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Michelle Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-25

7.  Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Frederick J Gallun; Marjorie R Leek; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The Effect of Dynamic Pitch on Speech Recognition in Temporally Modulated Noise.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.