Literature DB >> 7085996

Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages.

A K Nábĕlek, P K Robinson.   

Abstract

The Modified Rhyme Test (MRT) was processed through a room (volume 165 m3, reverberation time T = 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 s). For both binaural and monaural earphone listening the tests were recorded with a manikin (Kemar) and equalization filters to compensate for the ear canal effect. Six groups of subjects, ten subjects each, had mean ages of 10, 27, 42, 54, 64 and 72 years and average hearing threshold levels. HTLs (for 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz) of 2.7, 5.6, 6.0, 10.9, 14.4, 17.5 dB, respectively. The individual scores for the MRT without reverberation were between 90% and 100% at 70 dB SPL. Children and the elderly required from 10 to 20 dB higher SPLs than young adults to obtain maximum scores. An analysis of variance showed that all the main effects: T, age, and monaural versus binaural listening were significant. The scores declined with T for all ages. The best scores were obtained by the young adults (27 year olds). The binaural scores were about 5% better than monaural scores. Factors contributing to the results and practical implications for amplification are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7085996     DOI: 10.1121/1.387773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recognition of accented English in quiet and noise by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly.

Authors:  Pierre L Divenyi; Philip B Stark; Kara M Haupt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Time-forward speech intelligibility in time-reversed rooms.

Authors:  Laricia Longworth-Reed; Eugene Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Perceptually relevant parameters for virtual listening simulation of small room acoustics.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Sarah F Poissant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Failure of the precedence effect with a noise-band vocoder.

Authors:  Bernhard U Seeber; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Selecting and Pre-setting Amplification for Children: Where Do We Begin?

Authors:  D E Lewis
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

10.  The benefits of hearing aids and closed captioning for television viewing by older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Julia S Callahan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.