Literature DB >> 12031521

Mapping lateralization of click trains in younger and older populations.

Harvey Babkoff1, Chava Muchnik, Nofar Ben-David, Miriam Furst, Shmuel Even-Zohar, Minka Hildesheimer.   

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to describe and compare lateralization of earphone-presented stimuli in younger and older individuals. Lateralization functions, relating perceived location to either interaural time differences (ITDs) or interaural level differences (ILDs) were determined for 78 subjects, aged 21-88 years, who responded by pressing one of nine keys to indicate the perceived location of the stimulus. All subjects were healthy, without any history of hearing loss or ear surgery and within the normal pure tone audiometric range for their age group. Interaural pure tone and click thresholds did not differ by more than 5 dB across ears. The ILD lateralization functions, ranging from 10 dB favoring the left ear to 10 dB favoring the right ear were linear. In contrast, the ITD lateralization functions were S-shaped with a clear linear component ranging from 750 micros favoring one ear to 750 micros favoring the other ear and with an asymptote from 750 micros to 1 ms. The same general shape of the ITD and ILD lateralization functions was found at all ages, but the linear slope of the ITD lateralization function became shallower with age. The ability to discriminate midline-located click trains (ITD and ILD=0) from ITD-lateralized click trains deteriorated with age, while the comparable ability to discriminate ILD-lateralized click trains did not change significantly with age. The data support two general conclusions. First there seems to be an overall reduction in the range of ITD-based lateralization due to aging. Second, there is a greater reduction in sensitivity due to aging in changes from the perceived midline position (ITD and ILD=0) when ITD is manipulated than when ILD is manipulated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12031521     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00292-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  24 in total

1.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Auditory motion tracking ability of adults with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Keng Moua; Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults.

Authors:  Claudia Freigang; Kristina Schmiedchen; Ines Nitsche; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reduced temporal processing in older, normal-hearing listeners evident from electrophysiological responses to shifts in interaural time difference.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann C Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Megan Vargo
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.