Literature DB >> 20559641

Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Megan D Gall1, Jeffrey R Lucas.   

Abstract

Receiver sensory abilities can be influenced by a number of factors, including habitat, phylogeny and the selective pressure to acquire information about conspecifics or heterospecifics. It has been hypothesized that brood-parasitic brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) females may locate or determine the quality of potential hosts by eavesdropping on their sexual signals. This is expected to produce different sex-specific pressures on the auditory system to detect conspecific and heterospecific acoustic signals. Here, we examined auditory filter shape and efficiency, which influence the ability to resolve spectral and temporal information, in males and females at center frequencies of 2, 3 and 4 kHz. We found that overall, cowbirds had relatively wide filters (lsmean +/- SE: 619.8 +/- 41.6 Hz). Moreover, females had narrower filters (females: 491.4 +/- 66.8, males: 713.8 +/- 67.3 Hz) and greater filter efficiency (females: 59.0 +/- 2.0, males: 69.8 +/- 1.9 dB) than males. Our results suggest that the filters of female cowbirds may allow them to extract spectral information from heterospecific vocalizations. The broader auditory filters of males may reflect limited spectral energy in conspecific vocalizations in this frequency range, and hence, weaker selection for high resolution of frequency in the range of 2-4 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20559641     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-010-0543-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  32 in total

1.  Mapping of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in the inner ear of mouse and rat.

Authors:  A E Stenberg; H Wang; L Sahlin; M Hultcrantz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Detection of quasitrapezoidal frequency and amplitude modulation.

Authors:  A Sek; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Reverberation and frequency attenuation in forests--implications for acoustic communication in animals.

Authors:  Mark Padgham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Steroid-dependent auditory plasticity leads to adaptive coupling of sender and receiver.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros; Paul M Forlano; David L Deitcher; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Do avian brood parasites eavesdrop on heterospecific sexual signals revealing host quality? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Deseada Parejo; Jesús M Avilés
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Seasonal variation in avian auditory evoked responses to tones: a comparative analysis of Carolina chickadees, tufted titmice, and white-breasted nuthatches.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Lucas; Todd M Freeberg; Glenis R Long; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Seasonal changes in frequency tuning and temporal processing in single neurons in the frog auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Jozien B M Goense; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2005-10

9.  Nonconstant quality of auditory filters in the porpoises, Phocoena phocoena and Neophocaena phocaenoides (Cetacea, Phocoenidae).

Authors:  Vladimir V Popov; Alexander Ya Supin; Ding Wang; Kexiong Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Presence of aromatase and estrogen receptor alpha in the inner ear of zebra finches.

Authors:  Isabelle C Noirot; Henry J Adler; Charlotte A Cornil; Nobuhiro Harada; Robert J Dooling; Jacques Balthazart; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  10 in total

1.  Two measures of temporal resolution in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Kenneth S Henry; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The sensory substrate of multimodal communication in brown-headed cowbirds: are females sensory 'specialists' or 'generalists'?

Authors:  Kelly L Ronald; Timothy M Sesterhenn; Esteban Fernandez-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Songbirds tradeoff auditory frequency resolution and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Megan D Gall; Gavin M Bidelman; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Selecting auditory alerting stimuli for eagles on the basis of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Patrice Baumhardt; Ernesto Dominguez-Villegas; Todd Katzner; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise.

Authors:  Ioan A Lina; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  It takes a seasoned bird to be a good listener: communication between the sexes.

Authors:  Eliot A Brenowitz; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Songbird frequency selectivity and temporal resolution vary with sex and season.

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Therese S Salameh; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Do male and female cowbirds see their world differently? Implications for sex differences in the sensory system of an avian brood parasite.

Authors:  Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Agustin Ojeda; Marcella Deisher; Brianna Burry; Patrice Baumhardt; Amy Stark; Amanda G Elmore; Amanda L Ensminger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Acoustic Properties of Low Intensity Vocalizations Match Hearing Sensitivity in the Webbed-Toed Gecko, Gekko subpalmatus.

Authors:  Jingfeng Chen; Teppei Jono; Jianguo Cui; Xizi Yue; Yezhong Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sex differences in auditory brainstem response audiograms from vasopressin-deficient Brattleboro and wild-type Long-Evans rats.

Authors:  Payton E Charlton; Kelcie C Schatz; Kali Burke; Matthew J Paul; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.