Literature DB >> 23193125

Songbird frequency selectivity and temporal resolution vary with sex and season.

Megan D Gall1, Therese S Salameh, Jeffrey R Lucas.   

Abstract

Many species of songbirds exhibit dramatic seasonal variation in song output. Recent evidence suggests that seasonal changes in auditory processing are coincident with seasonal variation in vocal output. Here, we show, for the first time, that frequency selectivity and temporal resolution of the songbird auditory periphery change seasonally and in a sex-specific manner. Male and female house sparrows (Passer domesticus) did not differ in their frequency sensitivity during the non-breeding season, nor did they differ in their temporal resolution. By contrast, female house sparrows showed enhanced frequency selectivity during the breeding season, which was matched by a concomitant reduction of temporal resolution. However, males failed to show seasonal plasticity in either of these auditory properties. We discuss potential mechanisms generating these seasonal patterns and the implications of sex-specific seasonal changes in auditory processing for vocal communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23193125      PMCID: PMC3574405          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  39 in total

1.  Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds.

Authors:  F E Theunissen; K Sen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A comparative study of avian auditory brainstem responses: correlations with phylogeny and vocal complexity, and seasonal effects.

Authors:  J R Lucas; T M Freeberg; A Krishnan; G R Long
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Steroid-dependent auditory plasticity leads to adaptive coupling of sender and receiver.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros; Paul M Forlano; David L Deitcher; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Electrical tuning in hair cells isolated from the chick cochlea.

Authors:  P A Fuchs; T Nagai; M G Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  To modulate and be modulated: estrogenic influences on auditory processing of communication signals within a socio-neuro-endocrine framework.

Authors:  Kathleen M Yoder; David S Vicario
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Frequency tuning in a frog vestibular organ.

Authors:  J F Ashmore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Aug 11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Effects of estradiol on auditory evoked responses from the frog's auditory midbrain.

Authors:  S Yovanof; A S Feng
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1983-04-29       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold.

Authors:  R D Patterson; I Nimmo-Smith; D L Weber; R Milroy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Morphological and functional aspects of two different types of hair cells in the goldfish sacculus.

Authors:  I Sugihara; T Furukawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  13 in total

1.  The paradox of hearing at the lek: auditory sensitivity increases after breeding in female gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Mark A Bee; Megan D Gall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Do we hear what birds hear in birdsong?

Authors:  Robert J Dooling; Nora H Prior
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Hearing conspecific vocal signals alters peripheral auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Habitat-related differences in auditory processing of complex tones and vocal signal properties in four songbirds.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Lucas; Alejandro Vélez; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Age-related changes in the relationship between auditory brainstem responses and envelope-following responses.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Jyotishka Datta; Julie Ann Luna Torres; Charneka Hopkins; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

7.  Seasonal variations in auditory processing in the inferior colliculus of Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Kimberly E Miller; Kaitlyn Barr; Mitchell Krawczyk; Ellen Covey
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The sensory substrate of multimodal communication in brown-headed cowbirds: are females sensory 'specialists' or 'generalists'?

Authors:  Kelly L Ronald; Timothy M Sesterhenn; Esteban Fernandez-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  Estrogenic modulation of auditory processing: a vertebrate comparison.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.606

10.  Plasticity in ion channel expression underlies variation in hearing during reproductive cycles.

Authors:  Kevin N Rohmann; Daniel J Fergus; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.