Literature DB >> 26820470

It takes a seasoned bird to be a good listener: communication between the sexes.

Eliot A Brenowitz1, Luke Remage-Healey2.   

Abstract

Birds commonly use sound for communication between the sexes. In many songbird species, only males sing and there are pronounced sex differences in the neural song control circuits. By contrast, the auditory circuitry is largely similar in males and females. Both sexes learn to recognize vocalizations heard as juveniles and this shapes auditory response selectivity. Mating vocalizations are restricted to the breeding season, when sex steroid levels are elevated. Auditory cells, from the ear to the cortex, are hormone sensitive. Estrogens are synthesized in the brain and can modulate the activity of auditory neurons. In species that breed seasonally, elevated levels of estradiol in females transiently enhance their auditory responses to conspecific vocalizations, resulting in sex differences in audition.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26820470      PMCID: PMC4921280          DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  45 in total

1.  An avian basal ganglia pathway essential for vocal learning forms a closed topographic loop.

Authors:  M Luo; L Ding; D J Perkel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Sex differences and rapid estrogen signaling: A look at songbird audition.

Authors:  Amanda A Krentzel; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 4.  Reframing sexual differentiation of the brain.

Authors:  Margaret M McCarthy; Arthur P Arnold
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Auditory representations and memory in birdsong learning.

Authors:  Richard H R Hahnloser; Andreas Kotowicz
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 6.  Using learned calls to study sensory-motor integration in songbirds.

Authors:  David S Vicario
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Sexual differentiation of brain and behavior in the zebra finch: critical periods for effects of early estrogen treatment.

Authors:  E Adkins-Regan; V Mansukhani; C Seiwert; R Thompson
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1994-07

8.  Presence of aromatase and estrogen receptor alpha in the inner ear of zebra finches.

Authors:  Isabelle C Noirot; Henry J Adler; Charlotte A Cornil; Nobuhiro Harada; Robert J Dooling; Jacques Balthazart; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Differential expression of the immediate early genes FOS and ZENK following auditory stimulation in the juvenile male and female zebra finch.

Authors:  David J Bailey; Juli Wade
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19

10.  A dose-response study of estradiol's effects on the developing zebra finch song system.

Authors:  William Grisham; Janet Lee; Sun Hee Park; Jennifer L Mankowski; Arthur P Arnold
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  On the role of brain aromatase in females: why are estrogens produced locally when they are available systemically?

Authors:  Charlotte A Cornil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Sex bias and omission in neuroscience research is influenced by research model and journal, but not reported NIH funding.

Authors:  Gabriella M Mamlouk; David M Dorris; Lily R Barrett; John Meitzen
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 8.606

3.  How canaries listen to their song: Species-specific shape of auditory perception.

Authors:  Adam R Fishbein; Shelby L Lawson; Robert J Dooling; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Estrous cycle-induced sex differences in medium spiny neuron excitatory synaptic transmission and intrinsic excitability in adult rat nucleus accumbens core.

Authors:  Stephanie B Proaño; Hannah J Morris; Lindsey M Kunz; David M Dorris; John Meitzen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A Membrane G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor Is Necessary but Not Sufficient for Sex Differences in Zebra Finch Auditory Coding.

Authors:  Amanda A Krentzel; Matheus Macedo-Lima; Maaya Z Ikeda; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Serotonin, estrus, and social context influence c-Fos immunoreactivity in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Jessica L Hanson; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Life-Stage Dependent Plasticity in the Auditory System of a Songbird Is Signal and Emitter-Specific.

Authors:  Nicolas M Adreani; Pietro B D'Amelio; Manfred Gahr; Andries Ter Maat
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.