Literature DB >> 28819686

The sensory substrate of multimodal communication in brown-headed cowbirds: are females sensory 'specialists' or 'generalists'?

Kelly L Ronald1,2, Timothy M Sesterhenn3,4, Esteban Fernandez-Juricic3, Jeffrey R Lucas3.   

Abstract

Many animals communicate with multimodal signals. While we have an understanding of multimodal signal production, we know relatively less about receiver filtering of multimodal signals and whether filtering capacity in one modality influences filtering in a second modality. Most multimodal signals contain a temporal element, such as change in frequency over time or a dynamic visual display. We examined the relationship in temporal resolution across two modalities to test whether females are (1) sensory 'specialists', where a trade-off exists between the sensory modalities, (2) sensory 'generalists', where a positive relationship exists between the modalities, or (3) whether no relationship exists between modalities. We used female brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) to investigate this question as males court females with an audiovisual display. We found a significant positive relationship between female visual and auditory temporal resolution, suggesting that females are sensory 'generalists'. Females appear to resolve information well across multiple modalities, which may select for males that signal their quality similarly across modalities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brown-headed cowbirds; Individual variation; Multimodal sensory processing; Sensory filtering; Temporal resolution

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28819686      PMCID: PMC6549732          DOI: 10.1007/s00359-017-1203-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  35 in total

1.  Two measures of temporal resolution in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Kenneth S Henry; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A brain of her own: a neural correlate of song assessment in a female songbird.

Authors:  K S Hamilton; A P King; D R Sengelaub; M J West
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Using electroretinograms to assess flicker fusion frequency in domestic hens Gallus gallus domesticus.

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Björn Ekesten; Ragnar Tauson; Olle Håstad; Anders Odeen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Selective loss of cone function in mice lacking the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel CNG3.

Authors:  M Biel; M Seeliger; A Pfeifer; K Kohler; A Gerstner; A Ludwig; G Jaissle; S Fauser; E Zrenner; F Hofmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Visual sensitivity across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Alvin Eisner; Sara N Burke; Maureen D Toomey
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Avian retinal oil droplets: dietary manipulation of colour vision?

Authors:  Ben Knott; Mathew L Berg; Eric R Morgan; Katherine L Buchanan; James K Bowmaker; Andrew T D Bennett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Auditory event-related signals in mouse ERG recordings.

Authors:  Naoyuki Tanimoto; Vithiyanjali Sothilingam; Gabriele Gloeckner; Elizabeth C Bryda; Peter Humphries; Martin Biel; Mathias W Seeliger
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mate choice in the eye and ear of the beholder? Female multimodal sensory configuration influences her preferences.

Authors:  Kelly L Ronald; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.