Literature DB >> 21225270

Songbirds tradeoff auditory frequency resolution and temporal resolution.

Kenneth S Henry1, Megan D Gall, Gavin M Bidelman, Jeffrey R Lucas.   

Abstract

Physical tradeoffs may in some cases constrain the evolution of sensory systems. The peripheral auditory system, for example, performs a spectral decomposition of sound that should result in a tradeoff between frequency resolution and temporal resolution. We assessed temporal resolution in three songbird species using auditory brainstem responses to paired click stimuli. Temporal resolution was greater in house sparrows (Passer domesticus) than Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis), as predicted based on previous observations of broader auditory filters (lower frequency resolution) in house sparrows. Furthermore, within chickadees, individuals with broader auditory filters had greater temporal resolution. In contrast to predictions however, temporal resolution was similar between chickadees and nuthatches despite broader auditory filters in chickadees. These results and the results of a model simulation exploring the effect of broadened auditory filter bandwidth on temporal resolution in the auditory periphery strongly suggest that frequency resolution constrains temporal resolution in songbirds. Furthermore, our results suggest that songbirds have greater temporal resolution than some mammals, in agreement with recent behavioral studies. Species differences in temporal resolution may reflect adaptations for efficient processing of species-specific vocalizations, while individual differences within species may reflect experience-based developmental plasticity or hormonal effects. © Springer-Verlag 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21225270     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-010-0619-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  31 in total

1.  Quantitative study of plasticity in the auditory nuclei of chick under conditions of prenatal sound attenuation and overstimulation with species specific and music sound stimuli.

Authors:  S Wadhwa; P Anand; D Bhowmick
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.457

2.  An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  Ian C Bruce; Murray B Sachs; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Seasonal variation in avian auditory evoked responses to tones: a comparative analysis of Carolina chickadees, tufted titmice, and white-breasted nuthatches.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Lucas; Todd M Freeberg; Glenis R Long; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Mikko Sams; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The evolution of early vertebrate photoreceptors.

Authors:  Shaun P Collin; Wayne L Davies; Nathan S Hart; David M Hunt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Power-law dynamics in an auditory-nerve model can account for neural adaptation to sound-level statistics.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Modeling auditory-nerve responses for high sound pressure levels in the normal and impaired auditory periphery.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Sensorineural hearing loss and neural correlates of temporal acuity in the inferior colliculus of the C57BL/6 mouse.

Authors:  Joseph P Walton; Kathy Barsz; Willard W Wilson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-10

10.  Presence of aromatase and estrogen receptor alpha in the inner ear of zebra finches.

Authors:  Isabelle C Noirot; Henry J Adler; Charlotte A Cornil; Nobuhiro Harada; Robert J Dooling; Jacques Balthazart; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  20 in total

1.  Two measures of temporal resolution in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Kenneth S Henry; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Response recovery in the locust auditory pathway.

Authors:  Sarah Wirtssohn; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Do we hear what birds hear in birdsong?

Authors:  Robert J Dooling; Nora H Prior
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Habitat-related differences in auditory processing of complex tones and vocal signal properties in four songbirds.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Lucas; Alejandro Vélez; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus.

Authors:  Arik Kershenbaum; Daniel T Blumstein; Marie A Roch; Çağlar Akçay; Gregory Backus; Mark A Bee; Kirsten Bohn; Yan Cao; Gerald Carter; Cristiane Cäsar; Michael Coen; Stacy L DeRuiter; Laurance Doyle; Shimon Edelman; Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho; Todd M Freeberg; Ellen C Garland; Morgan Gustison; Heidi E Harley; Chloé Huetz; Melissa Hughes; Julia Hyland Bruno; Amiyaal Ilany; Dezhe Z Jin; Michael Johnson; Chenghui Ju; Jeremy Karnowski; Bernard Lohr; Marta B Manser; Brenda McCowan; Eduardo Mercado; Peter M Narins; Alex Piel; Megan Rice; Roberta Salmi; Kazutoshi Sasahara; Laela Sayigh; Yu Shiu; Charles Taylor; Edgar E Vallejo; Sara Waller; Veronica Zamora-Gutierrez
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-11-26

7.  How canaries listen to their song: Species-specific shape of auditory perception.

Authors:  Adam R Fishbein; Shelby L Lawson; Robert J Dooling; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Mate choice in the eye and ear of the beholder? Female multimodal sensory configuration influences her preferences.

Authors:  Kelly L Ronald; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The sensory substrate of multimodal communication in brown-headed cowbirds: are females sensory 'specialists' or 'generalists'?

Authors:  Kelly L Ronald; Timothy M Sesterhenn; Esteban Fernandez-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Songbird frequency selectivity and temporal resolution vary with sex and season.

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Therese S Salameh; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.