Literature DB >> 20550283

Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial elasticity model.

Shirshendu Paul1, Amit Katiyar, Kausik Sarkar, Dhiman Chatterjee, William T Shi, Flemming Forsberg.   

Abstract

Two nonlinear interfacial elasticity models--interfacial elasticity decreasing linearly and exponentially with area fraction--are developed for the encapsulation of contrast microbubbles. The strain softening (decreasing elasticity) results from the decreasing association between the constitutive molecules of the encapsulation. The models are used to find the characteristic properties (surface tension, interfacial elasticity, interfacial viscosity and nonlinear elasticity parameters) for a commercial contrast agent. Properties are found using the ultrasound attenuation measured through a suspension of contrast agent. Dynamics of the resulting models are simulated, compared with other existing models and discussed. Imposing non-negativity on the effective surface tension (the encapsulation experiences no net compressive stress) shows "compression-only" behavior. The exponential and the quadratic (linearly varying elasticity) models result in similar behaviors. The validity of the models is investigated by comparing their predictions of the scattered nonlinear response for the contrast agent at higher excitations against experimental measurement. All models predict well the scattered fundamental response. The nonlinear strain softening included in the proposed elastic models of the encapsulation improves their ability to predict subharmonic response. They predict the threshold excitation for the initiation of subharmonic response and its subsequent saturation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20550283      PMCID: PMC2896415          DOI: 10.1121/1.3418685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Deformable gas-filled microbubbles targeted to P-selectin.

Authors:  Joshua J Rychak; Jonathan R Lindner; Klaus Ley; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  On the suitability of broadband attenuation measurement for characterizing contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Dhiman Chatterjee; Kausik Sarkar; Pankaj Jain; Nathan E Schreppler
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The onset of microbubble vibration.

Authors:  Marcia Emmer; Annemieke van Wamel; Dave E Goertz; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Jillian F Haac; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Nonspherical oscillations of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Benjamin Dollet; Sander M van der Meer; Valeria Garbin; Nico de Jong; Detlef Lohse; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Strain energy function of red blood cell membranes.

Authors:  R Skalak; A Tozeren; R P Zarda; S Chien
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Growth and dissolution of an encapsulated contrast microbubble: effects of encapsulation permeability.

Authors:  Kausik Sarkar; Amit Katiyar; Pankaj Jain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  21 in total

1.  Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Reverse engineering the ultrasound contrast agent.

Authors:  Mark A Borden; Kang-Ho Song
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 12.984

3.  An iterative fullwave simulation approach to multiple scattering in media with randomly distributed microbubbles.

Authors:  Aditya Joshi; Brooks D Lindsey; Paul A Dayton; Gianmarco Pinton; Marie Muller
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results.

Authors:  Daniel A King; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Estimating concentration of ultrasound contrast agents with backscatter coefficients: experimental and theoretical aspects.

Authors:  Scott M Leithem; Roberto J Lavarello; William D O'Brien; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of encapsulation damping on the excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of droplet size and perfluorocarbon boiling point on the frequency dependence of acoustic vaporization threshold.

Authors:  Mitra Aliabouzar; Krishna N Kumar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Ultrasound enhanced matrix metalloproteinase-9 triggered release of contents from echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Rahul Nahire; Shirshendu Paul; Michael D Scott; Raushan K Singh; Wallace W Muhonen; John Shabb; Kara N Gange; D K Srivastava; Kausik Sarkar; Sanku Mallik
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Jonathan T Sutton; Kevin J Haworth; Gail Pyne-Geithman; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 6.648

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.