Literature DB >> 20535448

No early tibial tray loosening after surface cementing technique in mobile-bearing TKA.

Roberto Rossi1, Matteo Bruzzone, Davide Edoardo Bonasia, Andrea Ferro, Filippo Castoldi.   

Abstract

Controversy still exists regarding which cementation technique of the tibial component is preferable. Full cementation showed excellent long-term outcomes, and surface cementation with fixed-bearing designs provided excellent mid-term results. Concerns have been expressed about possible rotary forces to the tibial rotating platform, when the tibial stem remains cementless, with the risk of early loosening. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of early loosening and radiolucency lines in 70 consecutive unidirectional rotating platform, posterior stabilized, total knee arthroplasties, using surface cementation. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify any correlations between early loosening or radiolucency lines and clinically relevant covariates: age, sex, BMI, follow-up time, cement penetration, radiolucencies, tibial slope, femoral flexion, frontal alignment, pre-operative and post-operative Knee Scores. The tibial plateau was divided into four zones in antero-posterior view and into two zones in lateral view, and the cement penetration was evaluated in each zone. The mean follow-up was 43 months (SD 14), and the average patients' age was 73 (SD 7). The Knee Score averaged 91 (SD 8) and the Function score 86 (SD 17) at last follow-up visit. The cement penetration was >2 mm in all zones. No early loosening was detected, but in five asymptomatic patients (7%) radiolucency was noted around the tibial stem. The presence of radiolucent lines was not correlated with any of the covariates. The rate of early loosening and radiolucency lines with mobile tibial tray and surface cementation is comparable to other studies using different cementation techniques or surface cementation combined with fixed platform total knee arthroplasties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20535448     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1177-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  24 in total

1.  Negative pressure intrusion cementing technique for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J C Banwart; D A McQueen; E A Friis; C D Graber
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Micromotion between the half bearings in the interax prosthesis: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  M Marcacci; R Soavi; I Loreti; L Bragonzoni; F Iacono; A Visani
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Tibial component fixation with cement: full- versus surface-cementation techniques.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Marcis A Craig; R Alexander Mohr; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Carl C Berasi; Keith R Berend
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Primary stability of tibial components in TKA: in vitro comparison of two cementing techniques.

Authors:  Adrian Skwara; J Figiel; T Knott; J R J Paletta; S Fuchs-Winkelmann; C O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. a concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Michael R O'Rourke; Michael F Iossi; Steve S Liu; Devon D Goetz; David A Vittetoe; Patrick M Sullivan; Richard C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Factors influencing the intrusion of methylmethacrylate into human tibiae.

Authors:  L D Dorr; J P Lindberg; M Claude-Faugere; H H Malluche
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Revision after early aseptic failures in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sérgio Rocha Piedade; Alban Pinaroli; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Smith; V S Naima; M A Freeman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty-a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: part 2. Completely cemented components: MB not superior to AP components.

Authors:  Hans Hyldahl; Lars Regnér; Lars Carlsson; Johan Kärrholm; Lars Weidenhielm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Xiaoyun Pan; Tao Liu; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee flexion in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xiaojun Shi; Bin Shen; Pengde Kang; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparison of different cement application techniques for tibial component fixation in TKA.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Nicholas E Bishop; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Katrin Nagel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  An in vitro comparison of tibial tray cementation using gun pressurization or pulsed lavage.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Katrin Nagel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  No clinical difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  O Bailey; K Ferguson; E Crawfurd; P James; P A May; S Brown; M Blyth; W J Leach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Effect of tibial tray design on cement morphology in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Katrin Nagel
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anders M Refsum; Uy V Nguyen; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Birgitte Espehaug; Anne M Fenstad; Regina K Lein; Peter Ellison; Paul J Høl; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  10-year follow-up of the Columbus knee prostheses system in a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Andreas Fuchs; Philip Häussermann; Dirk Hömig; Björn Gunnar Ochs; Tim Klopfer; Christof A Müller; Peter Helwig; Lukas Konstantinidis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.928

9.  Tibial cleaning method for cemented total knee arthroplasty: An experimental study.

Authors:  Peter Helwig; Lukas Konstantinidis; Anja Hirschmüller; Verena Miltenberger; Kerstin Kuminack; Norbert P Südkamp; Oliver Hauschild
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.251

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.