Literature DB >> 22660964

The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee flexion in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Xiaojun Shi1, Bin Shen, Pengde Kang, Jing Yang, Zongke Zhou, Fuxing Pei.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and quantify the effect of the tibial slope on the postoperative maximal knee flexion and stability in the posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: Fifty-six patients (65 knees) who had undergone TKA with the posterior-stabilized prostheses were divided into the following 3 groups according to the measured tibial slopes: Group 1: ≤4°, Group 2: 4°-7° and Group 3: >7°. The preoperative range of the motion, the change in the posterior condylar offset, the elevation of the joint line, the postoperative tibiofemoral angle and the preoperative and postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores were recorded. The tibial anteroposterior translation was measured using the Kneelax 3 Arthrometer at both the 30° and the 90° flexion angles.
RESULTS: The mean values of the postoperative maximal knee flexion were 101° (SD 5), 106° (SD 5) and 113° (SD 9) in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. A significant difference was found in the postoperative maximal flexion between the 3 groups (P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were found between the 3 groups in the postoperative HSS scores, the changes in the posterior condylar offset, the elevation of the joint line or the tibial anteroposterior translation at either the 30° or the 90° flexion angles. A 1° increase in the tibial slope resulted in a 1.8° flexion increment (r = 1.8, R (2) = 0.463, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: An increase in the posterior tibial slope can significantly increase the postoperative maximal knee flexion. The tibial slope with an appropriate flexion and extension gap balance during the operation does not affect the joint stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22660964     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2058-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  41 in total

1.  How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?

Authors:  S David Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Contact stress at the anterior aspect of the tibial post in posterior-stabilized total knee replacement.

Authors:  Satoshi Hamai; Hiromasa Miura; Shuichi Matsuda; Takeshi Shimoto; Hidehiko Higaki; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Joint laxity and isokinetic thigh muscle strength characteristics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone patellar tendon bone versus quadrupled hamstring autografts.

Authors:  Mario Bizzini; Mark Gorelick; Urs Munzinger; Tomas Drobny
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.638

5.  Influence of tibial component posterior slope on in vivo knee kinematics in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F Catani; S Fantozzi; A Ensini; A Leardini; D Moschella; S Giannini
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Restoration of the joint line in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elango Selvarajah; Gary Hooper
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Reliability and validity of goniometric measurements at the knee.

Authors:  P P Gogia; J H Braatz; S J Rose; B J Norton
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1987-02

8.  Kinematic comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing inserts in NexGen legacy posterior stabilized flex total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kenrin Shi; Kenji Hayashida; Naoya Umeda; Kengo Yamamoto; Hideo Kawai
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  R Chaudhary; L A Beaupré; D W C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A A Hofmann; K N Bachus; R W Wyatt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  19 in total

1.  The increase in posterior tibial slope provides a positive biomechanical effect in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Sae Kwang Kwon; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Jun-Sang Lee; Yong-Gon Koh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Individual valgus correction angle improves accuracy of postoperative limb alignment restoration after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xiaojun Shi; Hai Li; Zongke Zhou; Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Pengde Kang; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Functional joint line obliquity after kinematic total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan Hutt; Vincent Massé; Martin Lavigne; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Factors affecting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty in patients with more than 120 degrees of preoperative flexion angle.

Authors:  Kazuya Sugitani; Yuji Arai; Hisatake Takamiya; Ryu Terauchi; Shuji Nakagawa; Keiichiro Ueshima; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Importance of the tibial slope in knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Silvan Wittenberg; Ufuk Sentuerk; Lisa Renner; Claude Weynandt; Carsten F Perka; Clemens Gwinner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Accuracy of a proximal tibial cutting method using the anterior tibial border in TKA.

Authors:  Hideyuki Sasanuma; Hitoshi Sekiya; Kenzo Takatoku; Takashi Ajiki; Hiroyoshi Hagiwara
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-01-22

7.  Bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty can reduce the risk of knee instability associated with posterior tibial slope.

Authors:  Masaru Hada; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Ken Okazaki; Takao Kaneko; Koji Murakami; Yuan Ma; Satoshi Hamai; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Do tibiofemoral contact point and posterior condylar offset influence outcome and range of motion in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  G J P Geijsen; P J C Heesterbeek; G van Stralen; P G Anderson; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Patient-specific and intra-operatively modifiable factors assessed by computer navigation predict maximal knee flexion one year after TKA.

Authors:  Frank Lampe; Carlos J Marques; Franziska Fiedler; Anusch Sufi-Siavach; Ana I Carita; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Kinematically aligned TKA can align knee joint line to horizontal.

Authors:  Hyung-Min Ji; Jun Han; Dong San Jin; Hyunseok Seo; Ye-Yeon Won
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.