Literature DB >> 24619387

An in vitro comparison of tibial tray cementation using gun pressurization or pulsed lavage.

Ulf J Schlegel1, Klaus Püschel, Michael M Morlock, Katrin Nagel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Aseptic loosening of the tibial component remains a limitation to the highly successful procedure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Pulsed lavage improves bone cement penetration and interface strength in tibial tray cementation. This study tested whether pressurized cement application with a cement gun can compensate the use of jet lavage for bone surface preparation.
METHODS: Tibial components were implanted in six pairs of cadaveric tibiae. On one side, pulsed lavage of the tibial bone was combined with finger packing of bone cement; on the other side, syringe lavage and gun cementing was used. Cement penetration into the bone was determined from computed tomography scans, and Interface strength was determined by pull-out testing.
RESULTS: Cement penetration was greater (p = 0.004) and interface strength was higher (p = 0.028) in the pulsed lavage group.
CONCLUSION: Pressurization of cement by gun application could not compensate for the omission of pulsed lavage. Thus, pulsed lavage should be considered a crucial factor in TKA to improve implant fixation, which cannot be compensated for by cement application technique.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24619387      PMCID: PMC3997762          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2303-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Failure of partial cementation to achieve implant stability and bone ingrowth: a long-term roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of tibial components.

Authors:  L Ryd; U Hansson; G Blunn; A Lindstrand; S Toksvig-Larsen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Survey of current cementing techniques in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Michael John Lutz; Brett Richard Halliday
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 3.  Cementing techniques for the tibial component in primary total knee replacement.

Authors:  D T Cawley; N Kelly; J P McGarry; F J Shannon
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique.

Authors:  M A Ritter; S A Herbst; E M Keating; P M Faris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Control of cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P S Walker; M Soudry; F C Ewald; H McVickar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Factors influencing the intrusion of methylmethacrylate into human tibiae.

Authors:  L D Dorr; J P Lindberg; M Claude-Faugere; H H Malluche
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Bone surface preparation in cemented joint replacement.

Authors:  R S Majkowski; A W Miles; G C Bannister; J Perkins; G J Taylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-05

8.  The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992.

Authors:  K Knutson; S Lewold; O Robertsson; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1994-08

9.  Cemented total hip arthroplasty with contemporary techniques. A five-year minimum follow-up study.

Authors:  G M Russotti; M B Coventry; R N Stauffer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Effect of cement pressure and bone strength on polymethylmethacrylate fixation.

Authors:  M J Askew; J W Steege; J L Lewis; J R Ranieri; R L Wixson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of different cement application techniques for tibial component fixation in TKA.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Nicholas E Bishop; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Katrin Nagel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Pulsatile Lavage During Cementation of Total Knee Arthroplasty - Is Fixation Impaired? A Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Claudio Glowalla; Max Ertl; Ulrich Lenze; Igor Lazic; Rainer Burgkart; Jan J Lang; Rudiger VON Eisenhart-Rothe; Florian Pohlig
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  How Much Bone Cement Is Utilized for Component Fixation in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Bhava R J Satish; Mohan Thadi; Subbiahgounder Thirumalaisamy; Apsingi Sunil; Praveen L Basanagoudar; Bernard Leo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-09

4.  Pulsed lavage cleansing of osteochondral grafts depends on lavage duration, flow intensity, and graft storage condition.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Weibo Jiang; Esther Cory; Jason P Caffrey; Felix H Hsu; Albert C Chen; Jincheng Wang; Robert L Sah; William D Bugbee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anders M Refsum; Uy V Nguyen; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Birgitte Espehaug; Anne M Fenstad; Regina K Lein; Peter Ellison; Paul J Høl; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Pulsatile Lavage Systems with High Impact Pressure and High Flow Produce Cleaner Cancellous Bone Prior to Cementation in Cemented Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin Knappe; Rudi G Bitsch; Mareike Schonhoff; Tilman Walker; Tobias Renkawitz; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Micromotion at the tibial plateau in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: fixed versus rotating platform designs.

Authors:  S R Small; R D Rogge; R A Malinzak; E M Reyes; P L Cook; K A Farley; M A Ritter
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.853

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.