Literature DB >> 24509880

No clinical difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

O Bailey1, K Ferguson, E Crawfurd, P James, P A May, S Brown, M Blyth, W J Leach.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is hypothesized that mobile polyethylene bearings in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may confer benefits with regard to range of motion and have improved clinical outcome scores in comparison with an arthroplasty with a fixed-bearing design. Our study compares clinical outcomes between patients who undergo TKA with either a rotating platform or fixed bearing using a posterior cruciate-retaining design.
METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-one patients were randomized to receive either a rotating-platform (161 patients) or a fixed-bearing (170 patients) implant. All patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 1 and 2 years post-operatively using standard tools (range of movement, Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Score, SF12 and Patella Score).
RESULTS: There was no difference in pre- to 2-year post-operative outcomes between the groups with regard to improvement in range of motion (10° ± 16 vs. 9° ± 15), improvement in Oxford Knee Score (-17.6 ± 9.9 vs. -19.1 ± 8.4), improvement in American Knee Society Score (49.5 ± 24.7 vs. 50.7 ± 21.0), function (23.6 ± 19.6 vs. 25.0 ± 22.5) and pain (34.9 ± 16.2 vs. 35.8 ± 14.1) subscores, improvement in SF12 Score (10.0 ± 16.3 vs. 12.3 ± 15.8) or improvement in Patella Score (9.7 ± 7.4 vs. 10.6 ± 7.1).
CONCLUSION: No difference was demonstrated in clinical outcome between patients with a rotating-platform and fixed-bearing posterior cruciate-retaining TKA at 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24509880     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2877-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  37 in total

1.  Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dongwook Kim; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee; Sahnghoon Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Paolo Aglietti; Andrea Baldini; Roberto Buzzi; Domenico Lup; Lapo De Luca
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty improves patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact stress: in vivo measurements in the same patients.

Authors:  Naohiro Sawaguchi; Tokifumi Majima; Takayuki Ishigaki; Noriaki Mori; Takashi Terashima; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Long-term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jun-Shik Kim; Jin-Woo Choe; Hyoung-Jin Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Differences in long-term fixation between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee prostheses at ten to 12 years' follow-up: a single-blinded randomised controlled radiostereometric trial.

Authors:  B G Pijls; E R Valstar; B L Kaptein; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-10

6.  A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A J Price; J L Rees; D Beard; E Juszczak; S Carter; S White; R de Steiger; C A F Dodd; M Gibbons; P McLardy-Smith; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-01

7.  Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years.

Authors:  A Lädermann; A Lübbeke; R Stern; N Riand; D Fritschy
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Terence J Gioe; Jason Glynn; Jonathan Sembrano; Kathleen Suthers; Edward R G Santos; Jasvinder Singh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  No differences in in vivo kinematics between six different types of knee prostheses.

Authors:  N Wolterbeek; R G H H Nelissen; E R Valstar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  In vivo healthy knee kinematics during dynamic full flexion.

Authors:  Satoshi Hamai; Taka-aki Moro-oka; Nicholas J Dunbar; Hiromasa Miura; Yukihide Iwamoto; Scott A Banks
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  16 in total

1.  Clinical outcome after total knee replacement.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Reha N Tandogan; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants.

Authors:  Robert Namba; Stephen Graves; Otto Robertsson; Ove Furnes; Susanna Stea; Lluis Puig-Verdié; Daniel Hoeffel; Guy Cafri; Elizabeth Paxton; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Long-term outcome of low contact stress total knee arthroplasty with different mobile bearing designs.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Antonio Spinarelli; Massimiliano Carrozzo; Andrea Piazzolla; Giovanni Vicenti; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-08-01

4.  Superior long-term survival for fixed bearing compared with mobile bearing in ligament-balanced total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; A H van Houten; J S Klenk; H Eijer; B Christen; A B Wymenga; A J Schuster
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Modifications of femoral component design in multi-radius total knee arthroplasty lead to higher lateral posterior femoro-tibial translation.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Philippe Moewis; Patrick Stein; Heide Boeth; Adam Trepczynski; Philipp von Roth; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Higher forgotten joint score for fixed-bearing than for mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Thienpont; D Zorman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  CORR Insights®: Rotating-platform TKA no different from fixed-bearing TKA regarding survivorship or performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Comparison of ultra-congruent mobile- and fixed-bearing navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty with minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Jung-Won Lim; Young-Bong Ko; Min-Gu Song; Han-Jun Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Survivorship at minimum 10-year follow-up of a rotating-platform, mobile-bearing, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michele Ulivi; Luca Orlandini; Valentina Meroni; Olmo Consonni; Valerio Sansone
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.