Literature DB >> 19082578

Revision after early aseptic failures in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Sérgio Rocha Piedade1, Alban Pinaroli, Elvire Servien, Philippe Neyret.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate cases of early aseptic failures presented during the first 5-year follow-up in a group of 981 primary total knee arthroplasty (primary TKA). Predisposing factors as well causes of failures and postoperative complications in different groups of aseptic failures were re-assessed and compared to a control group. A retrospective and cohort study compared one group of 944 primary TKA without surgical revision (890 patients) (Group A) with 22 primary TKA (22 patients) (Group B) that had revision TKA secondary to aseptic failure during the first five years follow-up. The cases of isolated patellar button replacement (n = 8) and infection (n = 7) were not considered in this study. All patients underwent a systematic assessment that included clinical and radiographic examinations, and IKS scores. Aseptic failure was more prevalent at the first 2-year follow-up (63%). TKA loosening (n = 11) and undiagnosed pain (n = 7) were considered the most frequent modes of failures, and laxity (n = 1) was a very rare early cause of failure. The aseptic failure group was characterized as average 5 years younger with a greater number of previous knee surgeries, lower IKS scores improvement, and more postoperative pain compared to control group, despite the fact that the aseptic failure group showed a prevalence of cases during the first 2-year follow-up. Inside this group, the undiagnosed pain group had lower improvement of IKS scores, a remarkable prevalence in prior surgical procedure (71%) and a minor mean interval between primary and revision TKA (11.6 months).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19082578     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0667-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  20 in total

1.  Preoperative planning for revision total knee arthroplasty:avoiding chaos.

Authors:  Kenneth A Gustke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision.

Authors:  Kevin J Mulhall; Hassan M Ghomrawi; Sean Scully; John J Callaghan; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Flexion and extension gap balancing in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  William M Mihalko; Kenneth A Krackow
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  C L Peters; R Hennessey; R M Barden; J O Galante; A G Rosenberg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  [Revision in non-infected total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 69 consecutive cases].

Authors:  M Bonnin; G Deschamps; P Neyret; P Chambat
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2000-11

6.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

7.  Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.

Authors:  J R Moreland; L W Bassett; G J Hanker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Total knee arthroplasty following prior distal femoral fracture.

Authors:  Elias C Papadopoulos; Javad Parvizi; Choon H Lai; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Postdischarge costs in arthroplasty surgery.

Authors:  Carlos J Lavernia; Michele R D'Apuzzo; Victor H Hernandez; David J Lee; Mark D Rossi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Do clinical presentation and pre-operative quality of life predict satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement?

Authors:  C Baumann; A C Rat; G Osnowycz; D Mainard; J P Delagoutte; C Cuny; F Guillemin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  No early tibial tray loosening after surface cementing technique in mobile-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Roberto Rossi; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Andrea Ferro; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  TKA outcomes after prior bone and soft tissue knee surgery.

Authors:  Sérgio Rocha Piedade; Alban Pinaroli; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Results of total knee arthroplasty with NexGen LPS-Flex for osteoarthritis in the valgus knee: a study of 26 patients followed for a minimum of 2 years.

Authors:  Naoki Nakano; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Takehiko Matsushita; Koji Takayama; Tokio Matsuzaki; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-07-17

4.  Predisposing factors which are relevant for the clinical outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francois Hardeman; Jürgen Londers; Alexander Favril; Erik Witvrouw; Johan Bellemans; Jan Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  The painful knee after TKA: a diagnostic algorithm for failure analysis.

Authors:  S Hofmann; G Seitlinger; O Djahani; M Pietsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Articular cartilage of the posterior condyle can affect rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Munenori Uemura; Shuichi Matsuda; Ken Okazaki; Shinya Kawahara; Makoto Hashizume; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Comparative retrieval analysis of a novel anatomic tibial tray backside: alterations in tibial component design and surface coating can increase cement adhesions and surface roughness.

Authors:  Dominic T Mathis; Joshua Schmidli; Felix Amsler; Johann Henckel; Harry Hothi; Alister Hart; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  High-flexion prosthesis improves function of TKA in Asian patients without decreasing early survivorship.

Authors:  Bum-Sik Lee; Jong-Won Chung; Jong-Min Kim; Kyung-Ah Kim; Seong-Il Bin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study.

Authors:  A Cerquiglini; J Henckel; H Hothi; P Allen; J Lewis; A Eskelinen; J Skinner; M T Hirschmann; A J Hart
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  High rate of tibial debonding and failure in a popular knee replacement : a follow-up review.

Authors:  David Keohane; Gerard A Sheridan; Eric Masterson
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.