Literature DB >> 20484640

Information about the weight of grasped objects from vision and internal models interacts within the primary motor cortex.

Morrison N Loh1, Louise Kirsch, John C Rothwell, Roger N Lemon, Marco Davare.   

Abstract

When grasping and lifting different objects, visual cues and previously acquired knowledge enable us to prepare the upcoming grasp by scaling the fingertip forces according to the actual weight of the object. However, when no visual information is available, the weight of the object has to be predicted based on information learned from previous grasps. Here, we investigated how changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE) and grip force scaling depend on the presence of visual cues and the weight of previously lifted objects. CSE was assessed by delivering transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at different times before grasp of the object. In conditions in which visual information was not provided, the size of motor evoked potentials (MEP) was larger when the object lifted was preceded by a heavy relative to a light object. Interestingly, the previous lift also affected MEP amplitude when visual cues about object weight were available but only in the period immediately after object presentation (50 ms); this effect had already declined for TMS delivered 150 ms after presentation. In a second experiment, we demonstrated that these CSE changes are used by the motor system to scale grip force. This suggests that the corticospinal system stores a "sensorimotor memory" of the grasp of different objects and relies on this memory when no visual cues are present. Moreover, visual information about weight interacts with this stored representation and allows the corticospinal system to switch rapidly to a different model of predictive grasp control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20484640      PMCID: PMC2880246          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6207-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  26 in total

1.  Learning and decay of prediction in object manipulation.

Authors:  A G Witney; S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Motor prediction.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; J R Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Neuronal correlates of motor performance and motor learning in the primary motor cortex of monkeys adapting to an external force field.

Authors:  C S Li; C Padoa-Schioppa; E Bizzi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Sensorimotor memory for fingertip forces: evidence for a task-independent motor memory.

Authors:  Barbara M Quaney; Diane L Rotella; Clayton Peterson; Kelly J Cole
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Sensorimotor memory for fingertip forces during object lifting: the role of the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Julia Berner; Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona; Dennis A Nowak
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  P M Rossini; A T Barker; A Berardelli; M D Caramia; G Caruso; R Q Cracco; M R Dimitrijević; M Hallett; Y Katayama; C H Lücking
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-08

8.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  28 in total

1.  Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis; Jonathan Cole
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Prior history of FDI muscle contraction: different effect on MEP amplitude and muscle activity.

Authors:  V L Talis; O V Kazennikov; J M Castellote; A A Grishin; M E Ioffe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perception-action dissociation generalizes to the size-inertia illusion.

Authors:  Jonathan Platkiewicz; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Corticospinal beta-range coherence is highly dependent on the pre-stationary motor state.

Authors:  Wolfgang Omlor; Luis Patino; Ignacio Mendez-Balbuena; Jürgen Schulte-Mönting; Rumyana Kristeva
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Observing how others lift light or heavy objects: time-dependent encoding of grip force in the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Kaat Alaerts; Toon T de Beukelaar; Stephan P Swinnen; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-09-20

6.  Corticospinal excitability is enhanced after visuomotor adaptation and depends on learning rather than performance or error.

Authors:  Hamid F Bagce; Soha Saleh; Sergei V Adamovich; John W Krakauer; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Corticospinal excitability underlying digit force planning for grasping in humans.

Authors:  Pranav Parikh; Marco Davare; Patrick McGurrin; Marco Santello
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Functional neuroanatomy of intuitive physical inference.

Authors:  Jason Fischer; John G Mikhael; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A switching cost for motor planning.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Preserved Object Weight Processing after Bilateral Lateral Occipital Complex Lesions.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Desiree Holler; Elizabeth E Michelakakis; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.