Literature DB >> 10899208

Learning and decay of prediction in object manipulation.

A G Witney1, S J Goodbody, D M Wolpert.   

Abstract

Anticipating the consequences of our own actions is a fundamental component of normal sensorimotor control and is seen, for example, during the manipulation of objects. When one hand pulls on an object held in the other hand, there is an anticipatory increase in grip force in the restraining hand that prevents the object from slipping. This anticipation is thought to rely on a forward internal model of the manipulated object and motor system, enabling the prediction of the consequences of our motor commands. Here we investigate the development of such a predictive response. Each hand held an object that was attached to its own torque motor. On each trial the subject was required to pull on the object held in the left hand and to maintain the position of the object held in the right hand. The torque motors were computer controlled so that the objects could be either "linked" so that the forces on the objects were equal and opposite, acting as though they were a single object, or "unlinked," so that they acted as two independent objects. A predictive response in the restraining hand is only necessary when the objects are linked and is unnecessary in the unlinked condition where there is no risk of the object slipping. To examine the learning and decay of predictive responses, we measured the grip force responses during unlinked trials that followed a linked trial. After a single linked trial, anticipatory grip force was quick to develop, but decayed slowly over the following unlinked trials. Varying the time between trials showed that the rate of decay depended on the number of trials since the last linked trial rather than time. Increasing the frequency of linked trials showed an increased level of subsequent grip force modulation, but did not alter the decay rate. When the torque motors simulated a linked object that did not have normal physical properties, prediction was reduced. These results show that the use of predictive responses has a different time course for learning and decay, and the response depends on experience and the physical properties of the objects.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10899208     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  17 in total

1.  Predictions specify reactive control of individual digits in manipulation.

Authors:  Yukari Ohki; Benoni B Edin; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Memory for fingertip forces: passive hand muscle vibration interferes with predictive grip force scaling.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Karin Rosenkranz; Joachim Hermsdörfer; John Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Information about the weight of grasped objects from vision and internal models interacts within the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Morrison N Loh; Louise Kirsch; John C Rothwell; Roger N Lemon; Marco Davare
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Anticipatory movement timing using prediction and external cues.

Authors:  Jeremy B Badler; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Drilling sounds are used by surgeons and intermediate residents, but not novice orthopedic trainees, to guide drilling motions.

Authors:  Monate Praamsma; Heather Carnahan; David Backstein; Christian J H Veillette; David Gonzalez; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Inoculation against falls: rapid adaptation by young and older adults to slips during daily activities.

Authors:  Yi-Chung Pai; Tanvi Bhatt; Edward Wang; Deborah Espy; Michael J Pavol
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Anticipatory scaling of grip forces when lifting objects of everyday life.

Authors:  Joachim Hermsdörfer; Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Sandra Eidenmüller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Grip force control of predictable external loads.

Authors:  J Hermsdörfer; H Blankenfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Hand interactions in rapid grip force adjustments are independent of object dynamics.

Authors:  Olivier White; Noreen Dowling; R Martyn Bracewell; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Coordination of fingertip forces in object transport during locomotion.

Authors:  Priska Gysin; Terry R Kaminski; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.