Literature DB >> 24401709

Perception-action dissociation generalizes to the size-inertia illusion.

Jonathan Platkiewicz1, Vincent Hayward.   

Abstract

Two objects of similar visual aspects and of equal mass, but of different sizes, generally do not elicit the same percept of heaviness in humans. The larger object is consistently felt to be lighter than the smaller, an effect known as the "size-weight illusion." When asked to repeatedly lift the two objects, the grip forces were observed to adapt rapidly to the true object weight while the size-weight illusion persisted, a phenomenon interpreted as a dissociation between perception and action. We investigated whether the same phenomenon can be observed if the mass of an object is available to participants through inertial rather than gravitational cues and if the number and statistics of the stimuli is such that participants cannot remember each individual stimulus. We compared the responses of 10 participants in 2 experimental conditions, where they manipulated 33 objects having uncorrelated masses and sizes, supported by a frictionless, air-bearing slide that could be oriented vertically or horizontally. We also analyzed the participants' anticipatory motor behavior by measuring the grip force before motion onset. We found that the perceptual illusory effect was quantitatively the same in the two conditions and observed that both visual size and haptic mass had a negligible effect on the anticipatory gripping control of the participants in the gravitational and inertial conditions, despite the enormous differences in the mechanics of the two conditions and the large set of uncorrelated stimuli.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human; mass perception; motor programming; precision grip; sensorimotor integration

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24401709      PMCID: PMC3962618          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00557.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  Charpentier (1891) on the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  D J Murray; R R Ellis; C A Bandomir; H E Ross
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-11

2.  Haptic perception of gravitational and inertial mass.

Authors:  Wouter M Bergmann Tiest; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Information about the weight of grasped objects from vision and internal models interacts within the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Morrison N Loh; Louise Kirsch; John C Rothwell; Roger N Lemon; Marco Davare
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dissociable neural mechanisms for determining the perceived heaviness of objects and the predicted weight of objects during lifting: an fMRI investigation of the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; Mary-Ellen Large; Erik C Chang; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The golf-ball illusion: evidence for top-down processing in weight perception.

Authors:  R R Ellis; S J Lederman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Constant errors in the execution and appreciation of movement.

Authors:  R Granit
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  When is a weight not illusory?

Authors:  H E Ross
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Mass estimation and discrimination during brief periods of zero gravity.

Authors:  H E Ross; M F Reschke
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-05

9.  Lifting without seeing: the role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mass is all that matters in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Myrthe A Plaisier; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Seeing motion of controlled object improves grip timing in adults with autism spectrum condition: evidence for use of inverse dynamics in motor control.

Authors:  Shinya Takamuku; Haruhisa Ohta; Chieko Kanai; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of varying gravity levels in parabolic flight on the size-mass illusion.

Authors:  Gilles Clément
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Object size can influence perceived weight independent of visual estimates of the volume of material.

Authors:  Myrthe A Plaisier; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Grip Force Adjustments Reflect Prediction of Dynamic Consequences in Varying Gravitoinertial Fields.

Authors:  Olivier White; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Philippe Lefèvre; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  When Does One Decide How Heavy an Object Feels While Picking It Up?

Authors:  Myrthe A Plaisier; Irene A Kuling; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27

6.  Touch as an auxiliary proprioceptive cue for movement control.

Authors:  A Moscatelli; M Bianchi; S Ciotti; G C Bettelani; C V Parise; F Lacquaniti; A Bicchi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 14.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.