Literature DB >> 23197454

Corticospinal excitability is enhanced after visuomotor adaptation and depends on learning rather than performance or error.

Hamid F Bagce1, Soha Saleh, Sergei V Adamovich, John W Krakauer, Eugene Tunik.   

Abstract

We used adaptation to high and low gains in a virtual reality setup of the hand to test competing hypotheses about the excitability changes that accompany motor learning. Excitability was assayed through changes in amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in relevant hand muscles elicited with single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). One hypothesis is that MEPs will either increase or decrease, directly reflecting the effect of low or high gain on motor output. The alternative hypothesis is that MEP changes are not sign dependent but rather serve as a marker of visuomotor learning, independent of performance or visual-to-motor mismatch (i.e., error). Subjects were required to make flexion movements of a virtual forefinger to visual targets. A gain of 1 meant that the excursions of their real finger and virtual finger matched. A gain of 0.25 ("low gain") indicated a 75% reduction in visual versus real finger displacement, a gain of 1.75 ("high gain") the opposite. MEP increases (>40%) were noted in the tonically activated task-relevant agonist muscle for both high- and low-gain perturbations after adaptation reached asymptote with kinematics matched to veridical levels. Conversely, only small changes in excitability occurred in a control task of pseudorandom gains that required adjustments to large errors but in which learning could not accumulate. We conclude that changes in corticospinal excitability are related to learning rather than performance or error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23197454      PMCID: PMC3569119          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00304.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  65 in total

1.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; L Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J C Keel; M J Smith; E M Wassermann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity.

Authors:  O D CREUTZFELDT; G H FROMM; H KAPP
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Information about the weight of grasped objects from vision and internal models interacts within the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Morrison N Loh; Louise Kirsch; John C Rothwell; Roger N Lemon; Marco Davare
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Voluntary movement and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over human motor cortex.

Authors:  Gabrielle Todd; Nigel C Rogasch; Stanley C Flavel; Michael C Ridding
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-02-26

8.  Spinal use-dependent plasticity of synaptic transmission in humans after a single cycling session.

Authors:  Sabine Meunier; Jeongyi Kwon; Heike Russmann; Shashi Ravindran; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Leonardo Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Task-dependent facilitation of motor evoked potentials during dynamic and steady muscle contractions.

Authors:  Z Arányi; J Mathis; C W Hess; K M Rösler
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Jonathan G Best; Mary C Stephenson; Jacinta O'Shea; Marzena Wylezinska; Z Tamas Kincses; Peter G Morris; Paul M Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  17 in total

1.  Prior history of FDI muscle contraction: different effect on MEP amplitude and muscle activity.

Authors:  V L Talis; O V Kazennikov; J M Castellote; A A Grishin; M E Ioffe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential plasticity of extensor and flexor motor cortex representations following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Quinn; A Miljevic; B K Rurak; W Marinovic; Ann-Maree Vallence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Corticospinal correlates of fast and slow adaptive processes in motor learning.

Authors:  Adjmal M E Sarwary; Miles Wischnewski; Dennis J L G Schutter; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Disruption of M1 Activity during Performance Plateau Impairs Consolidation of Motor Memories.

Authors:  Raphaël Hamel; Maxime Trempe; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Keita Takano; Natsuki Katagiri; Takatsugu Sato; Masafumi Jin; Tadaki Koseki; Daisuke Kudo; Kaito Yoshida; Shigeo Tanabe; Masahiro Tsujikawa; Kunitsugu Kondo; Tomofumi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 7.  Stroke Rehabilitation Using Virtual Environments.

Authors:  Michael J Fu; Jayme S Knutson; John Chae
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 1.784

8.  Two distinct interneuron circuits in human motor cortex are linked to different subsets of physiological and behavioral plasticity.

Authors:  Masashi Hamada; Joseph M Galea; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Paolo Mazzone; Ulf Ziemann; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements.

Authors:  Matthew Weightman; John-Stuart Brittain; R Chris Miall; Ned Jenkinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Facilitation of corticospinal excitability by virtual reality exercise following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy volunteers and subacute stroke subjects.

Authors:  Yeun Joon Kim; Jeonghun Ku; Sangwoo Cho; Hyun Jung Kim; Yun Kyung Cho; Teo Lim; Youn Joo Kang
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.