Literature DB >> 6499981

Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects.

R S Johansson, G Westling.   

Abstract

To be successful, precision manipulation of small objects requires a refined coordination of forces excerted on the object by the tips of the fingers and thumb. The present paper deals quantitatively with the regulation of the coordination between the grip force and the vertical lifting force, denoted as the load force, while small objects were lifted, positioned in space and replaced by human subjects using the pinch grip. It was shown that the grip force changed in parallel with the load force generated by the subject to overcome various forces counteracting the intended manipulation. The balance between the two forces was adapted to the friction between the skin and the object providing a relatively small safety margin to prevent slips, i.e. the more slippery the object the higher the grip force at any given load force. Experiments with local anaesthesia indicated that this adaptation was dependent on cutaneous afferent input. Afferent information related to the frictional condition could influence the force coordination already about 0.1 s after the object was initially gripped, i.e. approximately at the time the grip and load forces began to increase in parallel. Further, "secondary", adjustments of the force balance could occur later in response to small short-lasting slips, revealed as vibrations in the object. The new force balance following slips was maintained, indicating that the relationship between the two forces was set on the basis of a memory trace. Its updating was most likely accounted for by tactile afferent information entering intermittently at inappropriate force coordination, e.g. as during slips. The latencies between the onset of such slips and the appearance of the adjustments (0.06-0.08 s) clearly indicated that the underlying neural mechanisms operated highly automatically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6499981     DOI: 10.1007/bf00237997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Purkinje cell activity during motor learning.

Authors:  P F Gilbert; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-10       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Criticism and study of methods for examining sensibility in the hand.

Authors:  E MOBERG
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex.

Authors:  P E Crago; J C Houk; Z Hasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The skin and friction: deviations from Amonton's laws, and the effects of hydration and lubrication.

Authors:  S Comaish; E Bottoms
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  Interaction between forced grasping and a learned precision grip after ablation of the supplementary motor area.

Authors:  A M Smith; D Bourbonnais; G Blanchette
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-10-19       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  The reflex responses of single motor units in human first dorsal interosseous muscle following cutaneous afferent stimulation.

Authors:  R Garnett; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Peripheral afferent inputs to the forelimb area of the monkey motor cortex: input-output relations.

Authors:  I Rosén; H Asanuma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Changes in motor commands, as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man.

Authors:  R Garnett; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  351 in total

1.  Predictions specify reactive control of individual digits in manipulation.

Authors:  Yukari Ohki; Benoni B Edin; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Precision grip force control of older and younger adults, revisited.

Authors:  B D Lowe
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-12

3.  Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling; A Bäckström; J R Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Digit cooling influences grasp efficiency during manipulative tasks.

Authors:  D A Nowak; J Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Static prehension of a horizontally oriented object in three dimensions.

Authors:  Yen-Hsun Wu; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Memory-guided force control in healthy younger and older adults.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Shaadee Samimy; Samantha L Blouch; Peiyuan Wang; Amanda Chennavasin; Michele T Diaz; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Stretching the skin immediately enhances perceived stiffness and gradually enhances the predictive control of grip force.

Authors:  Mor Farajian; Raz Leib; Hanna Kossowsky; Tomer Zaidenberg; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Effect of human grip strategy on force control in precision tasks.

Authors:  Michelle N McDonnell; Michael C Ridding; Stanley C Flavel; Timothy S Miles
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Adaptations to fatigue of a single digit violate the principle of superposition in a multi-finger static prehension task.

Authors:  Tarkeshwar Singh; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.