Literature DB >> 24309748

Prior history of FDI muscle contraction: different effect on MEP amplitude and muscle activity.

V L Talis1, O V Kazennikov, J M Castellote, A A Grishin, M E Ioffe.   

Abstract

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation of left motor cortex were assessed in ten healthy subjects during maintenance of a fixed FDI contraction level. Subjects maintained an integrated EMG (IEMG) level with visual feedback and reproduced this level by memory afterwards in the following tasks: stationary FDI muscle contraction at the level of 40 ± 5 % of its maximum voluntary contraction (MVC; 40 % task), at the level of 20 ± 5 % MVC (20 % task), and also when 20 % MVC was preceded by either no contraction (0-20 task), by stronger muscle contraction (40-20 task) or by no contraction with a previous strong contraction (40-0-20 task). The results show that the IEMG level was within the prescribed limits when 20 and 40 % stationary tasks were executed with and without visual feedback. In 0-20, 40-20, and 40-0-20 tasks, 20 % IEMG level was precisely controlled in the presence of visual feedback, but without visual feedback the IEMG and force during 20 % IEMG maintenance were significantly higher in the 40-0-20 task than those in 0-20 and 40-20 tasks. That is, without visual feedback, there were significant variations in muscle activity due to different prehistory of contraction. In stationary tasks, MEP amplitudes in 40 % task were higher than in 20 % task. MEPs did not differ significantly during maintenance of the 20 % level in tasks with different prehistory of muscle contraction with and without visual feedback. Thus, in spite of variations in muscle background activity due to different prehistory of contraction MEPs did not vary significantly. This dissociation suggests that the voluntary maintenance of IEMG level is determined not only by cortical mechanisms, as reflected by corticospinal excitability, but also by lower levels of CNS, where afferent signals and influences from other brain structures and spinal cord are convergent.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24309748     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3789-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; L Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The contribution of fast corticospinal input to the voluntary activation of proximal muscles in normal subjects and in stroke patients.

Authors:  A Turton; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The history of contraction of the wrist flexors can change cortical excitability.

Authors:  Meg Stuart; Jane E Butler; David F Collins; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Information about the weight of grasped objects from vision and internal models interacts within the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Morrison N Loh; Louise Kirsch; John C Rothwell; Roger N Lemon; Marco Davare
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Anticipatory postural adjustment before bimanual unloading reactions: the role of the motor cortex in motor learning.

Authors:  O V Kazennikov; I A Solopova; V L Talis; M E Ioffe
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-09

Review 6.  Basal ganglia mechanisms underlying precision grip force control.

Authors:  Janey Prodoehl; Daniel M Corcos; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  [Control of different electromyogram levels of M. abductor pollicis brevis by means of visual feedback in healthy subjects].

Authors:  V L Talis; J M Castellote; O V Kazennikov; A A Grishin; M E Ioffe
Journal:  Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.437

8.  Cerebral activation during the exertion of sustained static force in man.

Authors:  C Dettmers; R N Lemon; K M Stephan; G R Fink; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-09-02       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Corticospinal excitability is enhanced after visuomotor adaptation and depends on learning rather than performance or error.

Authors:  Hamid F Bagce; Soha Saleh; Sergei V Adamovich; John W Krakauer; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Task-related variation in corticospinal output evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  S N Baker; E Olivier; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.