Literature DB >> 9201679

The use of active noise control (ANC) to reduce acoustic noise generated during MRI scanning: some initial results.

M McJury1, R W Stewart, D Crawford, E Toma.   

Abstract

MRI scanning generates high levels of acoustic noise that cannot only pose a safety hazard, but also impair communication between staff and patient. In this article we present active noise control (ANC) techniques that introduce antiphase noise to destructively interfere with the MRI noise and with the aim of producing a zone of quiet around the patient's ears. Using noise recorded from a 1.0 Tesla midfield MR scanner the acoustic noise generated by three standard MR imaging sequences was replayed to a real time two channel ANC system. The results obtained show a useful attenuation of low-frequency periodic acoustic noise components. Therefore, in combination with standard passive ear protection, this suggests that MR generated acoustic noise can be effectively attenuated at both low and high frequencies leading to improved patient comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9201679     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(96)00337-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  18 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A comprehensive experimental study of micro-perforated panel acoustic absorbers in MRI scanners.

Authors:  Gemin Li; Chris K Mechefske
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Acoustic noise reduction in T 1- and proton-density-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  Martin Ott; Martin Blaimer; Felix Breuer; David Grodzki; Björn Heismann; Peter Jakob
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Extraction of overt verbal response from the acoustic noise in a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan by use of segmented active noise cancellation.

Authors:  Kwan-Jin Jung; Parikshit Prasad; Yulin Qin; John R Anderson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Automated post-hoc noise cancellation tool for audio recordings acquired in an MRI scanner.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; Nick Cumming; Daniel Bor; Dennis Norris; Johannes Lyzenga
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  In situ active control of noise in a 4 T MRI scanner.

Authors:  Mingfeng Li; Brent Rudd; Teik C Lim; Jing-Huei Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Simulation study on active noise control for a 4-T MRI scanner.

Authors:  Mingfeng Li; Teik C Lim; Jing-Huei Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 9.  The challenges of neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Andrea Edwards; Topun Austin; Martin J Graves; David J Lomas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-11

10.  Comparison of image quality characteristics on Silent MR versus conventional MR imaging of brain lesions at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Susanne Ohlmann-Knafo; Melanie Morlo; David Laszlo Tarnoki; Adam Domonkos Tarnoki; Barbara Grabowski; Melanie Kaspar; Dirk Pickuth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.