Literature DB >> 9469720

Effects of the acoustic noise of the gradient systems on fMRI: a study on auditory, motor, and visual cortices.

Z H Cho1, S C Chung, D W Lim, E K Wong.   

Abstract

MR acoustic, or sound, noise due to gradient pulsing has been one of the problems in MRI, both in patient scanning as well as in many areas of psychiatric and neuroscience research, such as brain fMRI. Especially in brain fMRI, sound noise is one of the serious noise sources that obscures the small signals obtainable from the subtle changes occurring in oxygenation status in the cortex and blood capillaries. Therefore, we have studied the effects of acoustic, or sound, noise arising in fMR imaging of the auditory, motor, and visual cortices. The results show that the effects of acoustic noise on motor and visual responses are opposite. That is, for motor activity, there is an increased total motor activation, whereas for visual stimulation, the corresponding (visual) cortical activity is diminished substantially when the subject is exposed to a loud acoustic sound. Although the current observations are preliminary and require more experimental confirmation, it seems that the observed acoustic-noise effects on brain functions, such as in the motor and visual cortices, are new observations and could have significant consequences in data observation and interpretation in future fMRI studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9469720     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  19 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A comprehensive experimental study of micro-perforated panel acoustic absorbers in MRI scanners.

Authors:  Gemin Li; Chris K Mechefske
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; E C Caparelli; L Chang; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effect of fMRI acoustic noise on non-auditory working memory task: comparison between continuous and pulsed sound emitting EPI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch; Ernst W Radue; Markus Klarhöfer; Erich Seifritz; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Effects of scanner acoustic noise on intrinsic brain activity during auditory stimulation.

Authors:  Natalia Yakunina; Eun Kyoung Kang; Tae Su Kim; Ji-Hoon Min; Sam Soo Kim; Eui-Cheol Nam
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Temporal pattern of acoustic imaging noise asymmetrically modulates activation in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ruwan D Ranaweera; Minseok Kwon; Shuowen Hu; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  How challenges in auditory fMRI led to general advancements for the field.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.