Literature DB >> 20462325

Distortions in recall from visual memory: two classes of attractors at work.

Jie Huang1, Robert Sekuler.   

Abstract

In a trio of experiments, a matching procedure generated direct, analogue measures of short-term memory for the spatial frequency of Gabor stimuli. Experiment 1 showed that when just a single Gabor was presented for study, a retention interval of just a few seconds was enough to increase the variability of matches, suggesting that noise in memory substantially exceeds that in vision. Experiment 2 revealed that when a pair of Gabors was presented on each trial, the remembered appearance of one of the Gabors was influenced by: (1) the relationship between its spatial frequency and the spatial frequency of the accompanying, task-irrelevant non-target stimulus; and (2) the average spatial frequency of Gabors seen on previous trials. These two influences, which work on very different time scales, were approximately additive in their effects, each operating as an attractor for remembered appearance. Experiment 3 showed that a timely pre-stimulus cue allowed selective attention to curtail the influence of a task-irrelevant non-target, without diminishing the impact of the stimuli seen on previous trials. It appears that these two separable attractors influence distinct processes, with perception being influenced by the non-target stimulus and memory being influenced by stimuli seen on previous trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20462325      PMCID: PMC4104522          DOI: 10.1167/10.2.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  56 in total

1.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The human visual system averages speed information.

Authors:  S N Watamaniuk; A Duchon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  How big is a Gabor patch, and why should we care?

Authors:  R E Fredericksen; P J Bex; F A Verstraten
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Homogeneity computation: how interitem similarity in visual short-term memory alters recognition.

Authors:  Shivakumar Viswanathan; Daniel R Perl; Kristina M Visscher; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

9.  A population-coding model of attention's influence on contrast response: Estimating neural effects from psychophysical data.

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Age-related changes in imitating sequences of observed movements.

Authors:  Jessica Maryott; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-06
View more
  29 in total

1.  Attention protects the fidelity of visual memory: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Derek E Nee; Annelinde R E Vandenbroucke; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Central tendency representation and exemplar matching in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Chad Dubé
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

4.  Quantifying attentional effects on the fidelity and biases of visual working memory in young children.

Authors:  Sylvia B Guillory; Teodora Gliga; Zsuzsa Kaldy
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-11-22

Review 5.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of information storage in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  John T Serences
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Interactions between visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Attention-modulated alpha-band oscillations protect against intrusion of irrelevant information.

Authors:  Lisa Payne; Sylvia Guillory; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Older adults, unlike younger adults, do not modulate alpha power to suppress irrelevant information.

Authors:  Ryan J Vaden; Nathan L Hutcheson; Lesley A McCollum; Jonathan Kentros; Kristina M Visscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The power of predictions: An emerging paradigm for psychological research.

Authors:  J Benjamin Hutchinson; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.