Literature DB >> 21617025

A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations.

Timothy F Brady1, Talia Konkle, George A Alvarez.   

Abstract

Traditional memory research has focused on identifying separate memory systems and exploring different stages of memory processing. This approach has been valuable for establishing a taxonomy of memory systems and characterizing their function but has been less informative about the nature of stored memory representations. Recent research on visual memory has shifted toward a representation-based emphasis, focusing on the contents of memory and attempting to determine the format and structure of remembered information. The main thesis of this review will be that one cannot fully understand memory systems or memory processes without also determining the nature of memory representations. Nowhere is this connection more obvious than in research that attempts to measure the capacity of visual memory. We will review research on the capacity of visual working memory and visual long-term memory, highlighting recent work that emphasizes the contents of memory. This focus impacts not only how we estimate the capacity of the system--going beyond quantifying how many items can be remembered and moving toward structured representations--but how we model memory systems and memory processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21617025      PMCID: PMC3405498          DOI: 10.1167/11.5.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  152 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  A configural effect in visual short-term memory for features from different parts of an object.

Authors:  Jean-François Delvenne; Raymond Bruyer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  When do spatial and visual working memory interact?

Authors:  Justin N Wood
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Change blindness: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Associative learning improves visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Yuhong Jiang; Katherine Sledge Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Attentive Tracking Disrupts Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-01-01

9.  The Influence of Similarity on Visual Working Memory Representations.

Authors:  Po-Han Lin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-04

10.  Visual working memory capacity and proactive interference.

Authors:  Joshua K Hartshorne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  102 in total

1.  Does high memory load kick task-irrelevant information out of visual working memory?

Authors:  Jun Yin; Jifan Zhou; Haokui Xu; Junying Liang; Zaifeng Gao; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Radiologists remember mountains better than radiographs, or do they?

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Edith M Marom; Myrna C B Godoy; Diana Palacio; Tara Sagebiel; Sonia Betancourt Cuellar; Mark McEntee; Charles Tian; Patrick C Brennan; Tamara Miner Haygood
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-11-03

3.  Event-based proactive interference in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Deepna T Devkar; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

4.  The reliability and internal consistency of one-shot and flicker change detection for measuring individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Hrag Pailian; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

5.  Capacity for Visual Features in Mental Rotation.

Authors:  Yangqing Xu; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-07-14

6.  Task-relevant perceptual features can define categories in visual memory too.

Authors:  Karla B Antonelli; Carrick C Williams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

Review 7.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Strategic trade-offs between quantity and quality in working memory.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Sarah M Cormiea; Anish Kanabar; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory.

Authors:  David E Anderson; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Sequence structure organizes items in varied latent states of working memory neural network.

Authors:  Qiaoli Huang; Huihui Zhang; Huan Luo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.