Literature DB >> 29739867

Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.

Elizabeth S Lorenc1, Kartik K Sreenivasan2, Derek E Nee3,4, Annelinde R E Vandenbroucke3,5, Mark D'Esposito3,6.   

Abstract

Visual working memory (VWM) recruits a broad network of brain regions, including prefrontal, parietal, and visual cortices. Recent evidence supports a "sensory recruitment" model of VWM, whereby precise visual details are maintained in the same stimulus-selective regions responsible for perception. A key question in evaluating the sensory recruitment model is how VWM representations persist through distracting visual input, given that the early visual areas that putatively represent VWM content are susceptible to interference from visual stimulation.To address this question, we used a functional magnetic resonance imaging inverted encoding model approach to quantitatively assess the effect of distractors on VWM representations in early visual cortex and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), another region previously implicated in the storage of VWM information. This approach allowed us to reconstruct VWM representations for orientation, both before and after visual interference, and to examine whether oriented distractors systematically biased these representations. In our human participants (both male and female), we found that orientation information was maintained simultaneously in early visual areas and IPS in anticipation of possible distraction, and these representations persisted in the absence of distraction. Importantly, early visual representations were susceptible to interference; VWM orientations reconstructed from visual cortex were significantly biased toward distractors, corresponding to a small attractive bias in behavior. In contrast, IPS representations did not show such a bias. These results provide quantitative insight into the effect of interference on VWM representations, and they suggest a dynamic tradeoff between visual and parietal regions that allows flexible adaptation to task demands in service of VWM.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Despite considerable evidence that stimulus-selective visual regions maintain precise visual information in working memory, it remains unclear how these representations persist through subsequent input. Here, we used quantitative model-based fMRI analyses to reconstruct the contents of working memory and examine the effects of distracting input. Although representations in the early visual areas were systematically biased by distractors, those in the intraparietal sulcus appeared distractor-resistant. In contrast, early visual representations were most reliable in the absence of distraction. These results demonstrate the dynamic, adaptive nature of visual working memory processes, and provide quantitative insight into the ways in which representations can be affected by interference. Further, they suggest that current models of working memory should be revised to incorporate this flexibility.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/385267-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distraction; sensory recruitment; visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29739867      PMCID: PMC5990978          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3061-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  59 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Reevaluating the Sensory Account of Visual Working Memory Storage.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  The retention and disruption of color information in human short-term visual memory.

Authors:  Vanda A Nemes; Neil R A Parry; David Whitaker; Declan J McKeefry
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Differential effects of distraction during working memory on delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex and the visual association cortex.

Authors:  Jong H Yoon; Clayton E Curtis; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Spatial specificity of working memory representations in the early visual cortex.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short-term memory task.

Authors:  E K Miller; L Li; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Hemispheric asymmetry in visuotopic posterior parietal cortex emerges with visual short-term memory load.

Authors:  Summer L Sheremata; Katherine C Bettencourt; David C Somers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Similarity-based distortion of visual short-term memory is due to perceptual averaging.

Authors:  Chad Dubé; Feng Zhou; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  21 in total

1.  Selection of Visual Objects in Perception and Working Memory One at a Time.

Authors:  Nina Thigpen; Nathan M Petro; Jessica Oschwald; Klaus Oberauer; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-07-19

2.  Characterizing the Impact of Distracting Input on Visual Working Memory Representations.

Authors:  Doris Pischedda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  The Posterior Parietal Cortex in Adaptive Visual Processing.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Distraction biases working memory for faces.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Anurima Mummaneni; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

6.  Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  The what, where and how of delay activity.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Understanding occipital and parietal contributions to visual working memory: Commentary on Xu (2020).

Authors:  Chunyue Teng; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-02-15

9.  Revisit once more the sensory storage account of visual working memory.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-09-20

Review 10.  Persistent Activity During Working Memory From Front to Back.

Authors:  Clayton E Curtis; Thomas C Sprague
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.