Literature DB >> 20081162

Homogeneity computation: how interitem similarity in visual short-term memory alters recognition.

Shivakumar Viswanathan1, Daniel R Perl, Kristina M Visscher, Michael J Kahana, Robert Sekuler.   

Abstract

Visual short-term recognition memory for multiple stimuli is strongly influenced by the study items' similarity to one another-that is, by their homogeneity. However, the mechanism responsible for this homogeneity effect has remained unclear. We evaluated competing explanations of this effect, using controlled sets of Gabor patches as study items and probe stimuli. Our results, based on recognition memory for spatial frequency, rule out the possibility that the homogeneity effect arises because similar study items are encoded and/or maintained with higher fidelity in memory than dissimilar study items are. Instead, our results support the hypothesis that the homogeneity effect reflects trial-by-trial comparisons of study items, which generate a homogeneity signal. This homogeneity signal modulates recognition performance through an adjustment of the subject's decision criterion. Additionally, it seems the homogeneity signal is computed prior to the presentation of the probe stimulus, by evaluating the familiarity of each new stimulus with respect to the items already in memory. This suggests that recognition-like processes operate not only on the probe stimulus, but on study items as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20081162      PMCID: PMC2854579          DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

Review 1.  Low-level memory processes in vision.

Authors:  S Magnussen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Feature-sampling and random-walk models of individual-stimulus recognition.

Authors:  Koen Lamberts; Noellie Brockdorff; Evan Heit
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-09

3.  Recognizing spatial patterns: a noisy exemplar approach.

Authors:  Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.

Authors:  S E Clark; S D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

9.  A task-irrelevant stimulus attribute affects perception and short-term memory.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

10.  Auditory short-term memory behaves like visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Elina Kaplan; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  12 in total

1.  Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Daniel R Little; Christopher Donkin; Mario Fific
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Interactions between visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Similarity-based distortion of visual short-term memory is due to perceptual averaging.

Authors:  Chad Dubé; Feng Zhou; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Distortions in recall from visual memory: two classes of attractors at work.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Method matters: systematic effects of testing procedure on visual working memory sensitivity.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Leah M Watson; Wilma Koutstaal; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Neural circuit basis of visuo-spatial working memory precision: a computational and behavioral study.

Authors:  Rita Almeida; João Barbosa; Albert Compte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Similarity effects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Hyejin J Lee; Anthony Asaad; Roger Remington
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

9.  Intracranial electroencephalography reveals two distinct similarity effects during item recognition.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Robert Sekuler; Brian Litt; Armin Brandt; Gordon Baltuch; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Large capacity temporary visual memory.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress; Mary C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.