Literature DB >> 18217847

Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch.

Marc O Ernst1.   

Abstract

When different perceptual signals of the same physical property are integrated, for example, an objects' size, which can be seen and felt, they form a more reliable sensory estimate (e.g., M. O. Ernst & M. S. Banks, 2002). This, however, implies that the sensory system already knows which signals belong together and how they relate. In other words, the system has to know the mapping between the signals. In a Bayesian model of cue integration, this prior knowledge can be made explicit. Here, we ask whether such a mapping between two arbitrary sensory signals from vision and touch can be learned from their statistical co-occurrence such that they become integrated. In the Bayesian framework, this means changing the belief about the distribution of the stimuli. To this end, we trained subjects with stimuli that are usually unrelated in the world--the luminance of an object (visual signal) and its stiffness (haptic signal). In the training phase, we then presented subjects with combinations of these two signals, which were artificially correlated, and thus, we introduced a new mapping between them. For example, the stiffer the object, the brighter it was. We measured the influence of learning by comparing discrimination performance before and after training. The prediction is that integration makes discrimination worse for stimuli, which are incongruent with the newly learned mapping, because integration would cause this incongruency to disappear perceptually. The more certain subjects are about the new mapping, the stronger should the influence be on discrimination performance. Thus, learning in this context is about acquiring beliefs. We found a significant change in discrimination performance before and after training when comparing trials with congruent and incongruent stimuli. After training, discrimination thresholds for the incongruent stimuli are increased relative to thresholds for congruent stimuli, suggesting that subjects learned effectively to integrate the two formerly unrelated signals.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18217847     DOI: 10.1167/7.5.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  92 in total

1.  Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Retrieval of associative information congruent with prior knowledge is related to increased medial prefrontal activity and connectivity.

Authors:  Marlieke T R van Kesteren; Mark Rijpkema; Dirk J Ruiter; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities.

Authors:  James V M Hanson; James Heron; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The role of attention on the integration of visual and inertial cues.

Authors:  Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of visuohaptic experience in visually perceived depth.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Sascha Serwe; Julia Trommershäuser; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The role of cross-modal associations in statistical learning.

Authors:  Arit Glicksohn; Asher Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

7.  Effect of pitch-space correspondence on sound-induced visual motion perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Constructive perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Gin McCollum
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Multisensory oddity detection as bayesian inference.

Authors:  Timothy Hospedales; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Near-optimal integration of orientation information across saccades.

Authors:  Elad Ganmor; Michael S Landy; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.