Literature DB >> 28836145

Interactions between visual working memory representations.

Gi-Yeul Bae1, Steven J Luck2.   

Abstract

We investigated whether the representations of different objects are maintained independently in working memory or interact with each other. Observers were shown two sequentially presented orientations and required to reproduce each orientation after a delay. The sequential presentation minimized perceptual interactions so that we could isolate interactions between memory representations per se. We found that similar orientations were repelled from each other whereas dissimilar orientations were attracted to each other. In addition, when one of the items was given greater attentional priority by means of a cue, the representation of the high-priority item was not influenced very much by the orientation of the low-priority item, but the representation of the low-priority item was strongly influenced by the orientation of the high-priority item. This indicates that attention modulates the interactions between working memory representations. In addition, errors in the reported orientations of the two objects were positively correlated under some conditions, suggesting that representations of distinct objects may become grouped together in memory. Together, these results demonstrate that working-memory representations are not independent but instead interact with each other in a manner that depends on attentional priority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Attraction; Interaction; Repulsion; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836145      PMCID: PMC5744598          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1404-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  49 in total

1.  Understanding the object benefit in visual short-term memory: the roles of feature proximity and connectedness.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-07

2.  Visual grouping in human parietal cortex.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Maria Olkkonen; Sarah R Allred; Colin Wilson; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Similarity effects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Hyejin J Lee; Anthony Asaad; Roger Remington
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

7.  Homogeneity computation: how interitem similarity in visual short-term memory alters recognition.

Authors:  Shivakumar Viswanathan; Daniel R Perl; Kristina M Visscher; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

8.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The Influence of Similarity on Visual Working Memory Representations.

Authors:  Po-Han Lin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-04

10.  A dynamic neural field model of visual working memory and change detection.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer; Steven J Luck; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05-01
View more
  17 in total

1.  Attentional capture alters feature perception.

Authors:  Jiageng Chen; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2018-08-01

3.  Increased repulsion of working memory representations in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Gi-Yeul Bae; Kyle Frankovich; Benjamin M Robinson; Carly J Leonard; James M Gold; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-09-03

4.  Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Thomas C Sprague; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Reorganization of spatial configurations in visual working memory.

Authors:  J David Timm; Frank Papenmeier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

7.  Adaptive Memory Distortions Are Predicted by Feature Representations in Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Yufei Zhao; Avi J H Chanales; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Distraction biases working memory for faces.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Anurima Mummaneni; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

9.  Serial dependence in vision: Merely encoding the previous-trial target is not enough.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

10.  Adaptive Repulsion of Long-Term Memory Representations Is Triggered by Event Similarity.

Authors:  Avi J H Chanales; Alexandra G Tremblay-McGaw; Maxwell L Drascher; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.