Literature DB >> 16356328

Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis.

Edward K Vogel1, Geoffrey F Woodman, Steven J Luck.   

Abstract

Attention operates at an early stage in some experimental paradigms and at a late stage in others, which suggests that the locus of selection is flexible. The present study was designed to determine whether the locus of selection can vary flexibly within a single experimental paradigm as a function of relatively modest variations in stimulus and task parameters. In the first experiment, a new method for assessing the locus of selection was developed. Specifically, attention can influence perceptual encoding only if it is directed to the target before a perceptual representation of the target has been formed, whereas attention can influence postperceptual processes even if attention is cued after perception is complete. Event-related potentials were used to confirm the validity of this method. The subsequent experiments used cueing tasks in which subjects were required to perceive and remember a set of objects, and the difficulty of the perception and memory components of the task were varied. When the task overloaded perception but not working memory, attention influenced the formation of perceptual representations but not the storage of these representations in memory; when the task overloaded working memory but not perception, attention influenced the transfer of perceptual representations into memory but not the formation of the perceptual representations. Thus, attention operates to select relevant information at whatever stage or stages of processing are overloaded by a particular stimulus-task combination.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16356328     DOI: 10.1162/089892905775008599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  39 in total

1.  Visual working memory deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease are due to both reduced storage capacity and impaired ability to filter out irrelevant information.

Authors:  Eun-Young Lee; Nelson Cowan; Edward K Vogel; Terry Rolan; Fernando Valle-Inclán; Steven A Hackley
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Tal Makovsik; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

3.  Personal names do not always survive the attentional blink: Behavioral evidence for a flexible locus of selection.

Authors:  Barry Giesbrecht; Jocelyn L Sy; Megan K Lewis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Eye movements as a gatekeeper for memorization: evidence for the persistence of attentional sets in visual memory search.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-28

Review 6.  The offline stream of conscious representations.

Authors:  Claire Sergent
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Semantic analysis does not occur in the absence of awareness induced by interocular suppression.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Attentive Tracking Disrupts Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-01-01

9.  A task-irrelevant stimulus attribute affects perception and short-term memory.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

10.  The Role of Attention in the Binding of Surface Features to Locations.

Authors:  Joo-Seok Hyun; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.