Literature DB >> 19272812

Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.

Min-Suk Heo1, Da-Hye Choi, Erika Benavides, Kyung-Hoe Huh, Won-Jin Yi, Sam-Sun Lee, Soon-Chul Choi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of different bit depths and kilovoltage peak (kVp) values used in intraoral digital radiography on observer performance in detecting subtle radiographic density differences. STUDY
DESIGN: Using an intraoral CCD sensor set at 8- or 12-bit depth, kVp set at 60 or 70, and 14 different exposure times, digital radiographs were acquired of a specially designed aluminum step-wedge phantom with small holes of different depths in each step. Ten observers examined all images.
RESULTS: The observers counted more holes with the 12-bit images compared with the 8-bit images, particularly at 60 kVp. Significantly more holes were also counted with images taken at 70 kVp compared with those taken at 60 kVp.
CONCLUSION: Regarding the detection of subtle radiographic density differences, 12-bit images and 70 kVp were superior to 8-bit images and 60 kVp.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19272812     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  9 in total

1.  A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 2: the influence of intra-oral image receptor on periodontal measurements.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Hilde Bosmans; Jie Yang; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.

Authors:  D J McIlgorm; J P McNulty
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Influence of the image file format of digital periapical radiographs on the diagnosis of external and internal root resorptions.

Authors:  Murilo Miranda-Viana; Daniela Verardi Madlum; Nicolly Oliveira-Santos; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Matheus L Oliveira
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  How does duration of curing affect the radiopacity of dental materials?

Authors:  Arash Poorsattar Bejeh Mir; Morvarid Poorsattar Bejeh Mir
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-06-25

5.  Effect of LCD monitor type and observer experience on diagnostic performance in soft-copy interpretations of the maxillary sinus on panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Tae-Young Kim; Jin-Woo Choi; Sam-Sun Lee; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Soon-Chul Choi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2011-03-26

6.  Evaluation of a Mathematical Model for Digital Image Enhancement.

Authors:  Hassem Geha; Ibrahim Nasseh; Marcel Noujeim
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-07-31

7.  Numerical Evaluation of Image Contrast for Thicker and Thinner Objects among Current Intraoral Digital Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Oyunbat Dashpuntsag; Midori Yoshida; Ryosuke Kasai; Naoki Maeda; Hidehiko Hosoki; Eiichi Honda
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Digital file format does not influence the radiographic diagnosis of vertical root fracture.

Authors:  Murilo Miranda-Viana; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Amanda Farias Gomes; Fernanda Nogueira-Reis; Yuri Nejaim; Matheus L Oliveira; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 1.882

9.  The influence of tube potential on periodontal bone level measurements and subjective image quality using a digital photostimulable storage phosphor sensor.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2010-04-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.