Literature DB >> 20425830

Consent for genetic research in the Framingham Heart Study.

Daniel Levy1, Greta Lee Splansky, Nicolle K Strand, Larry D Atwood, Emelia J Benjamin, Susan Blease, L Adrienne Cupples, Ralph B D'Agostino, Caroline S Fox, Margaret Kelly-Hayes, Greg Koski, Martin G Larson, Karen M Mutalik, Elizabeth Oberacker, Christopher J O'Donnell, Patrice Sutherland, Maureen Valentino, Ramachandran S Vasan, Philip A Wolf, Joanne M Murabito.   

Abstract

Extensive efforts have been aimed at understanding the genetic underpinnings of complex diseases that affect humans. Numerous genome-wide association studies have assessed the association of genes with human disease, including the Framingham Heart Study (FHS), which genotyped 550,000 SNPs in 9,000 participants. The success of such efforts requires high rates of consent by participants, which is dependent on ethical oversight, communications, and trust between research participants and investigators. To study this we calculated percentages of participants who consented to collection of DNA and to various uses of their genetic information in two FHS cohorts between 2002 and 2009. The data included rates of consent for providing a DNA sample, creating an immortalized cell line, conducting research on various genetic conditions including those that might be considered sensitive, and for notifying participants of clinically significant genetic findings were above 95%. Only with regard to granting permission to share DNA or genetic findings with for-profit companies was the consent rate below 95%. We concluded that the FHS has maintained high rates of retention and consent for genetic research that has provided the scientific freedom to establish collaborations and address a broad range of research questions. We speculate that our high rates of consent have been achieved by establishing frequent and open communications with participants that highlight extensive oversight procedures. Our approach to maintaining high consent rates via ethical oversight of genetic research and communication with study participants is summarized in this report and should be of help to other studies engaged in similar types of research. Published 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20425830      PMCID: PMC2923558          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  18 in total

1.  Rules for research on human genetic variation--lessons from Iceland.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Framingham data not for sale.

Authors:  T Ready
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  The Framingham Offspring Study. Design and preliminary data.

Authors:  M Feinleib; W B Kannel; R J Garrison; P M McNamara; W P Castelli
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Genetics. No longer de-identified.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  T R DAWBER; G F MEADORS; F E MOORE
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1951-03

6.  The Third Generation Cohort of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study: design, recruitment, and initial examination.

Authors:  Greta Lee Splansky; Diane Corey; Qiong Yang; Larry D Atwood; L Adrienne Cupples; Emelia J Benjamin; Ralph B D'Agostino; Caroline S Fox; Martin G Larson; Joanne M Murabito; Christopher J O'Donnell; Ramachandran S Vasan; Philip A Wolf; Daniel Levy
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

Authors:  Ebony B Bookman; Aleisha A Langehorne; John H Eckfeldt; Kathleen C Glass; Gail P Jarvik; Michael Klag; Greg Koski; Arno Motulsky; Benjamin Wilfond; Teri A Manolio; Richard R Fabsitz; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Obtaining informed consent for genetic studies: The multiethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  David Green; Mary Cushman; Norma Dermond; Eric A Johnson; Cecilia Castro; Donna Arnett; Joel Hill; Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Multiple loci associated with indices of renal function and chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Anna Köttgen; Nicole L Glazer; Abbas Dehghan; Shih-Jen Hwang; Ronit Katz; Man Li; Qiong Yang; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer; Tamara B Harris; Albert V Smith; Dan E Arking; Brad C Astor; Eric Boerwinkle; Georg B Ehret; Ingo Ruczinski; Robert B Scharpf; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Ian H de Boer; Talin Haritunians; Thomas Lumley; Mark Sarnak; David Siscovick; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy; Ashish Upadhyay; Yurii S Aulchenko; Albert Hofman; Fernando Rivadeneira; André G Uitterlinden; Cornelia M van Duijn; Daniel I Chasman; Guillaume Paré; Paul M Ridker; W H Linda Kao; Jacqueline C Witteman; Josef Coresh; Michael G Shlipak; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience.

Authors:  Geraldine M McQuillan; Kathryn S Porter; Maria Agelli; Raynard Kington
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  16 in total

1.  Diverse perceptions of the informed consent process: implications for the recruitment and participation of diverse communities in the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Kimberley D Lakes; Elaine Vaughan; Marissa Jones; Wylie Burke; Dean Baker; James M Swanson
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2012-03

2.  Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample.

Authors:  Carla L Storr; Flora Or; William W Eaton; Nicholas Ialongo
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-20

3.  Participation in Genetic Research: Amazon's Mechanical Turk Workforce in the United States and India.

Authors:  Susan W Groth; Ann Dozier; Margaret Demment; Dongmei Li; I Diana Fernandez; Jack Chang; Timothy Dye
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Big Data Privacy in Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Luca Bonomi; Wenrui Dai; Feng Chen; Cynthia Cheung; Cinnamon S Bloss; Samuel Cheng; Xiaoqian Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Big Data       Date:  2016-09-13

5.  Attitudes Toward Genetics and Genetic Testing Among Participants in the Jackson and Framingham Heart Studies.

Authors:  Katherine W Saylor; Lynette Ekunwe; Donna Antoine-LaVigne; Deborah E Sellers; Sarah McGraw; Daniel Levy; Greta Lee Splansky; Steven Joffe
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  The "right not to know" in the genomic era: time to break from tradition?

Authors:  Benjamin E Berkman; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  Preferences for Return of Genetic Results Among Participants in the Jackson Heart Study and Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Steven Joffe; Deborah E Sellers; Lynette Ekunwe; Donna Antoine-Lavigne; Sarah McGraw; Daniel Levy; Greta Lee Splansky
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2019-11-22

Review 8.  70-year legacy of the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Charlotte Andersson; Andrew D Johnson; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Consent for Use of Genetic Data among US Hispanics/Latinos: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/ Study of Latinos.

Authors:  Sara Gonzalez; Garrett Strizich; Carmen R Isasi; Simin Hua; Betsy Comas; Tamar Sofer; Bharat Thyagarajan; Krista M Perreira; Gregory A Talavera; Martha L Daviglus; Sarah C Nelson; Aida L Giachello; Neil Schneiderman; Robert C Kaplan
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 1.847

10.  'You should at least ask'. The expectations, hopes and fears of rare disease patients on large-scale data and biomaterial sharing for genomics research.

Authors:  Pauline McCormack; Anna Kole; Sabina Gainotti; Deborah Mascalzoni; Caron Molster; Hanns Lochmüller; Simon Woods
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.