Literature DB >> 27049302

'You should at least ask'. The expectations, hopes and fears of rare disease patients on large-scale data and biomaterial sharing for genomics research.

Pauline McCormack1, Anna Kole2, Sabina Gainotti3, Deborah Mascalzoni4, Caron Molster5, Hanns Lochmüller6, Simon Woods1.   

Abstract

Within the myriad articles about participants' opinions of genomics research, the views of a distinct group - people with a rare disease (RD) - are unknown. It is important to understand if their opinions differ from the general public by dint of having a rare disease and vulnerabilities inherent in this. Here we document RD patients' attitudes to participation in genomics research, particularly around large-scale, international data and biosample sharing. This work is unique in exploring the views of people with a range of rare disorders from many different countries. The authors work within an international, multidisciplinary consortium, RD-Connect, which has developed an integrated platform connecting databases, registries, biobanks and clinical bioinformatics for RD research. Focus groups were conducted with 52 RD patients from 16 countries. Using a scenario-based approach, participants were encouraged to raise topics relevant to their own experiences, rather than these being determined by the researcher. Issues include wide data sharing, and consent for new uses of historic samples and for children. Focus group members are positively disposed towards research and towards allowing data and biosamples to be shared internationally. Expressions of trust and attitudes to risk are often affected by the nature of the RD which they have experience of, as well as regulatory and cultural practices in their home country. Participants are concerned about data security and misuse. There is an acute recognition of the vulnerability inherent in having a RD and the possibility that open knowledge of this could lead to discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27049302      PMCID: PMC5027679          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  28 in total

1.  Unravelling fears of genetic discrimination: an exploratory study of Dutch HCM families in an era of genetic non-discrimination acts.

Authors:  Els Geelen; Klasien Horstman; Carlo L M Marcelis; Pieter A Doevendans; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Informed consent: a broken contract.

Authors:  Erika Check Hayden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Biobanks and the phantom public.

Authors:  Herbert Gottweis; Haidan Chen; Johannes Starkbaum
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.

Authors:  Kieran C O'Doherty; Michael M Burgess; Kelly Edwards; Richard P Gallagher; Alice K Hawkins; Jane Kaye; Veronica McCaffrey; David E Winickoff
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Fear of e-Health records implementation?

Authors:  Audrey Laur
Journal:  Med Leg J       Date:  2014-07-15

6.  Consent for genetic research in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Daniel Levy; Greta Lee Splansky; Nicolle K Strand; Larry D Atwood; Emelia J Benjamin; Susan Blease; L Adrienne Cupples; Ralph B D'Agostino; Caroline S Fox; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Greg Koski; Martin G Larson; Karen M Mutalik; Elizabeth Oberacker; Christopher J O'Donnell; Patrice Sutherland; Maureen Valentino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Philip A Wolf; Joanne M Murabito
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  The use of focus groups in social and behavioural research: some methodological issues.

Authors:  M E Khan; M Anker; B C Patel; S Barge; H Sadhwani; R Kohle
Journal:  World Health Stat Q       Date:  1991

8.  The TREAT-NMD Duchenne muscular dystrophy registries: conception, design, and utilization by industry and academia.

Authors:  Catherine L Bladen; Karen Rafferty; Volker Straub; Soledad Monges; Angélica Moresco; Hugh Dawkins; Anna Roy; Teodora Chamova; Velina Guergueltcheva; Lawrence Korngut; Craig Campbell; Yi Dai; Nina Barišić; Tea Kos; Petr Brabec; Jes Rahbek; Jaana Lahdetie; Sylvie Tuffery-Giraud; Mireille Claustres; France Leturcq; Rabah Ben Yaou; Maggie C Walter; Olivia Schreiber; Veronika Karcagi; Agnes Herczegfalvi; Venkatarman Viswanathan; Farhad Bayat; Isis de la Caridad Guerrero Sarmiento; Anna Ambrosini; Francesca Ceradini; En Kimura; Janneke C van den Bergen; Miriam Rodrigues; Richard Roxburgh; Anna Lusakowska; Jorge Oliveira; Rosário Santos; Elena Neagu; Niculina Butoianu; Svetlana Artemieva; Vedrana Milic Rasic; Manuel Posada; Francesc Palau; Björn Lindvall; Clemens Bloetzer; Ayşe Karaduman; Haluk Topaloğlu; Serap Inal; Piraye Oflazer; Angela Stringer; Andriy V Shatillo; Ann S Martin; Holly Peay; Kevin M Flanigan; David Salgado; Brigitta von Rekowski; Stephen Lynn; Emma Heslop; Sabina Gainotti; Domenica Taruscio; Jan Kirschner; Jan Verschuuren; Kate Bushby; Christophe Béroud; Hanns Lochmüller
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Opinions of Young Adults on Re-Consenting for Biobanking.

Authors:  Amanda Rush; Robert Battisti; Belinda Barton; Daniel Catchpoole
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.

Authors:  Nanibaa' A Garrison; Nila A Sathe; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Ingrid A Holm; Saskia C Sanderson; Maureen E Smith; Melissa L McPheeters; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  33 in total

1.  Ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) in rare diseases: a landscape analysis from funders.

Authors:  Adam L Hartman; Anneliene Hechtelt Jonker; Melissa A Parisi; Daria Julkowska; Nicole Lockhart; Rosario Isasi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  "Just tell me what's going on": The views of parents of children with genetic conditions regarding the research use of their child's electronic health record.

Authors:  Sara M Andrews; Melissa Raspa; Anne Edwards; Rebecca Moultrie; Lauren Turner-Brown; Laura Wagner; Alexandra Alvarez Rivas; Mary Katherine Frisch; Anne C Wheeler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Preferences for Accessing Electronic Health Records for Research Purposes: Views of Parents Who Have a Child With a Known or Suspected Genetic Condition.

Authors:  Melissa Raspa; Ryan S Paquin; Derek S Brown; Sara Andrews; Anne Edwards; Rebecca Moultrie; Laura Wagner; MaryKate Frisch; Lauren Turner-Brown; Anne C Wheeler
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  The ethics of genomic medicine: redefining values and norms in the UK and France.

Authors:  Marie Gaille; Ruth Horn
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 5.351

5.  New Recommendation on Biological Materials Could Hamper Muscular Dystrophy Research.

Authors:  Pauline McCormack; Simon Woods
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2016-12-21

6.  Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research.

Authors:  Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Harriet J A Teare; Jane Kaye; Stephan Beck; Heidi Beate Bentzen; Luciana Caenazzo; Clive Collett; Flavio D'Abramo; Heike Felzmann; Teresa Finlay; Muhammad Kassim Javaid; Erica Jones; Višnja Katić; Amy Simpson; Deborah Mascalzoni
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 7.  Progress in Rare Diseases Research 2010-2016: An IRDiRC Perspective.

Authors:  Hugh J S Dawkins; Ruxandra Draghia-Akli; Paul Lasko; Lilian P L Lau; Anneliene H Jonker; Christine M Cutillo; Ana Rath; Kym M Boycott; Gareth Baynam; Hanns Lochmüller; Petra Kaufmann; Yann Le Cam; Virginie Hivert; Christopher P Austin
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 8.  Society and personal genome data.

Authors:  Anna Middleton
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Public and patient involvement in needs assessment and social innovation: a people-centred approach to care and research for congenital disorders of glycosylation.

Authors:  Cláudia de Freitas; Vanessa Dos Reis; Susana Silva; Paula A Videira; Eva Morava; Jaak Jaeken
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Your DNA, Your Say.

Authors:  Anna Middleton
Journal:  New Bioeth       Date:  2017-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.