Literature DB >> 16013724

Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration.

K K Brock1, M B Sharpe, L A Dawson, S M Kim, D A Jaffray.   

Abstract

As more pretreatment imaging becomes integrated into the treatment planning process and full three-dimensional image-guidance becomes part of the treatment delivery the need for a deformable image registration technique becomes more apparent. A novel finite element model-based multiorgan deformable image registration method, MORFEUS, has been developed. The basis of this method is twofold: first, individual organ deformation can be accurately modeled by deforming the surface of the organ at one instance into the surface of the organ at another instance and assigning the material properties that allow the internal structures to be accurately deformed into the secondary position and second, multi-organ deformable alignment can be achieved by explicitly defining the deformation of a subset of organs and assigning surface interfaces between organs. The feasibility and accuracy of the method was tested on MR thoracic and abdominal images of healthy volunteers at inhale and exhale. For the thoracic cases, the lungs and external surface were explicitly deformed and the breasts were implicitly deformed based on its relation to the lung and external surface. For the abdominal cases, the liver, spleen, and external surface were explicitly deformed and the stomach and kidneys were implicitly deformed. The average accuracy (average absolute error) of the lung and liver deformation, determined by tracking visible bifurcations, was 0.19 (s.d.: 0.09), 0.28 (s.d.: 0.12) and 0.17 (s.d.: 0.07) cm, in the LR, AP, and IS directions, respectively. The average accuracy of implicitly deformed organs was 0.11 (s.d.: 0.11), 0.13 (s.d.: 0.12), and 0.08 (s.d.: 0.09) cm, in the LR, AP, and IS directions, respectively. The average vector magnitude of the accuracy was 0.44 (s.d.: 0.20) cm for the lung and liver deformation and 0.24 (s.d.: 0.18) cm for the implicitly deformed organs. The two main processes, explicit deformation of the selected organs and finite element analysis calculations, require less than 120 and 495 s, respectively. This platform can facilitate the integration of deformable image registration into online image guidance procedures, dose calculations, and tissue response monitoring as well as performing multi-modality image registration for purposes of treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16013724     DOI: 10.1118/1.1915012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  92 in total

1.  Evaluations of an adaptive planning technique incorporating dose feedback in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Han Liu; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A stochastic approach to estimate the uncertainty of dose mapping caused by uncertainties in b-spline registration.

Authors:  Martina Hub; Christian Thieke; Marc L Kessler; Christian P Karger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation.

Authors:  Carolyn J Niu; Warren D Foltz; Michael Velec; Joanne L Moseley; Adil Al-Mayah; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Extraction of tumor motion trajectories using PICCS-4DCBCT: a validation study.

Authors:  Zhihua Qi; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Jinkoo Kim; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Canny edge-based deformable image registration.

Authors:  Vasant Kearney; Yihui Huang; Weihua Mao; Baohong Yuan; Liping Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Implementing Radiation Dose-Volume Liver Response in Biomechanical Deformable Image Registration.

Authors:  Daniel F Polan; Mary Feng; Theodore S Lawrence; Randall K Ten Haken; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  An initial investigation of hyperpolarized gas tagging magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating deformable image registration-based lung ventilation.

Authors:  Taoran Cui; G Wilson Miller; John P Mugler; Gordon D Cates; Jaime F Mata; Eduard E de Lange; Qijie Huang; Talissa A Altes; Fang-Fang Yin; Jing Cai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Effect of material property heterogeneity on biomechanical modeling of prostate under deformation.

Authors:  Navid Samavati; Deirdre M McGrath; Michael A S Jewett; Theo van der Kwast; Cynthia Ménard; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Four-dimensional deformable image registration using trajectory modeling.

Authors:  Edward Castillo; Richard Castillo; Josue Martinez; Maithili Shenoy; Thomas Guerrero
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.