Literature DB >> 23599216

Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31.

Alissa L Allen1, John E McGeary, Valerie S Knopik, John E Hayes.   

Abstract

Demand for nonnutritive sweeteners continues to increase due to their ability to provide desirable sweetness with minimal calories. Acesulfame potassium and saccharin are well-studied nonnutritive sweeteners commonly found in food products. Some individuals report aversive sensations from these sweeteners, such as bitter and metallic side tastes. Recent advances in molecular genetics have provided insight into the cause of perceptual differences across people. For example, common alleles for the genes TAS2R9 and TAS2R38 explain variable response to the bitter drugs ofloxacin in vitro and propylthiouracil in vivo. Here, we wanted to determine whether differences in the bitterness of acesulfame potassium could be predicted by common polymorphisms (genetic variants) in bitter taste receptor genes (TAS2Rs). We genotyped participants (n = 108) for putatively functional single nucleotide polymorphisms in 5 TAS2Rs and asked them to rate the bitterness of 25 mM acesulfame potassium on a general labeled magnitude scale. Consistent with prior reports, we found 2 single nucleotide polymorphisms in TAS2R31 were associated with acesulfame potassium bitterness. However, TAS2R9 alleles also predicted additional variation in acesulfame potassium bitterness. Conversely, single nucleotide polymorphisms in TAS2R4, TAS2R38, and near TAS2R16 were not significant predictors. Using 1 single nucleotide polymorphism each from TAS2R9 and TAS2R31, we modeled the simultaneous influence of these single nucleotide polymorphisms on acesulfame potassium bitterness; together, these 2 single nucleotide polymorphisms explained 13.4% of the variance in perceived bitterness. These data suggest multiple polymorphisms within TAS2Rs contribute to the ability to perceive the bitterness from acesulfame potassium.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Project GIANT-CS; bitterness; genetics; noncaloric sweetener; saccharin; taste phenotype

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23599216      PMCID: PMC3657735          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjt017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  48 in total

1.  Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Margaret R Wallace; Valerie S Knopik; Deborah M Herbstman; Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake.

Authors:  M E Dinehart; J E Hayes; L M Bartoshuk; S L Lanier; V B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-12-20

3.  Polymorphisms in TAS2R38 and the taste bud trophic factor, gustin gene co-operate in modulating PROP taste phenotype.

Authors:  Carla Calò; Alessandra Padiglia; Andrea Zonza; Laura Corrias; Paolo Contu; Beverly J Tepper; Iole Tomassini Barbarossa
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-06-25

4.  Effect of drinking soda sweetened with aspartame or high-fructose corn syrup on food intake and body weight.

Authors:  M G Tordoff; A M Alleva
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Bridget S Sullivan; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-04-07

6.  Divergent taste responsiveness to fruit of the tree Antidesma bunius.

Authors:  R I Henkin; W T Gillis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors.

Authors:  J Chandrashekar; K L Mueller; M A Hoon; E Adler; L Feng; W Guo; C S Zuker; N J Ryba
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Julie M Peterson; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-09-15

9.  Qualitative differences among sweeteners.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; D A Reilly; T B Clark
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1979-07

10.  Bitter taste receptors influence glucose homeostasis.

Authors:  Cedrick D Dotson; Lan Zhang; Hong Xu; Yu-Kyong Shin; Stephan Vigues; Sandra H Ott; Amanda E T Elson; Hyun Jin Choi; Hillary Shaw; Josephine M Egan; Braxton D Mitchell; Xiaodong Li; Nanette I Steinle; Steven D Munger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  25 in total

1.  Gender differences in the influence of personality traits on spicy food liking and intake.

Authors:  Nadia K Byrnes; John E Hayes
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.565

2.  Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test.

Authors:  Jennifer E Douglas; Corrine J Mansfield; Charles J Arayata; Beverly J Cowart; Lauren R Colquitt; Ivy W Maina; Mariel T Blasetti; Noam A Cohen; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Polymorphisms in TRPV1 and TAS2Rs associate with sensations from sampled ethanol.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Self-reported Smoking Status, TAS2R38 Variants, and Propylthiouracil Phenotype: An Exploratory Crowdsourced Cohort Study.

Authors:  Allison N Baker; Anjelica M Miranda; Nicole L Garneau; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  TAS2R bitter taste receptors regulate thyroid function.

Authors:  Adam A Clark; Cedrick D Dotson; Amanda E T Elson; Anja Voigt; Ulrich Boehm; Wolfgang Meyerhof; Nanette I Steinle; Steven D Munger
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Use of Adult Sensory Panel to Study Individual Differences in the Palatability of a Pediatric HIV Treatment Drug.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Phoebe S Mathew; Elizabeth D Lowenthal
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Predominant Qualities Evoked by Quinine, Sucrose, and Capsaicin Associate With PROP Bitterness, but not TAS2R38 Genotype.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Regional differences in suprathreshold intensity for bitter and umami stimuli.

Authors:  Emma L Feeney; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.833

9.  Differences in food intake and genetic variability in taste receptors between Czech pregnant women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Vendula Bartáková; Katarína Kuricová; Filip Zlámal; Jana Bělobrádková; Katetřina Kaňková
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.614

10.  Do polymorphisms in chemosensory genes matter for human ingestive behavior?

Authors:  John E Hayes; Emma L Feeney; Alissa L Allen
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.