Literature DB >> 25024507

Interpreting consumer preferences: physicohedonic and psychohedonic models yield different information in a coffee-flavored dairy beverage.

Bangde Li1, John E Hayes1, Gregory R Ziegler2.   

Abstract

Designed experiments provide product developers feedback on the relationship between formulation and consumer acceptability. While actionable, this approach typically assumes a simple psychophysical relationship between ingredient concentration and perceived intensity. This assumption may not be valid, especially in cases where perceptual interactions occur. Additional information can be gained by considering the liking-intensity function, as single ingredients can influence more than one perceptual attribute. Here, 20 coffee-flavored dairy beverages were formulated using a fractional mixture design that varied the amount of coffee extract, fluid milk, sucrose, and water. Overall liking (liking) was assessed by 388 consumers using an incomplete block design (4 out of 20 prototypes) to limit fatigue; all participants also rated the samples for intensity of coffee flavor (coffee), milk flavor (milk), sweetness (sweetness) and thickness (thickness). Across product means, the concentration variables explained 52% of the variance in liking in main effects multiple regression. The amount of sucrose (β = 0.46) and milk (β = 0.46) contributed significantly to the model (p's <0.02) while coffee extract (β = -0.17; p = 0.35) did not. A comparable model based on the perceived intensity explained 63% of the variance in mean liking; sweetness (β = 0.53) and milk (β = 0.69) contributed significantly to the model (p's <0.04), while the influence of coffee flavor (β = 0.48) was positive but marginally (p = 0.09). Since a strong linear relationship existed between coffee extract concentration and coffee flavor, this discrepancy between the two models was unexpected, and probably indicates that adding more coffee extract also adds a negative attribute, e.g. too much bitterness. In summary, modeling liking as a function of both perceived intensity and physical concentration provides a richer interpretation of consumer data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Optimization; coffee milk; consumer insight; physicohedonic model; psychohedonic model; psychophysical model

Year:  2014        PMID: 25024507      PMCID: PMC4094130          DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Qual Prefer        ISSN: 0950-3293            Impact factor:   5.565


  9 in total

1.  Color of low-fat cheese influences flavor perception and consumer liking.

Authors:  R Wadhwani; D J McMahon
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  The pleasantness of mixtures in taste and olfaction.

Authors:  H T Lawless
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1977-05

4.  Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Bridget S Sullivan; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-04-07

5.  Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; B J Booth; M L Losee; S D Pecore; Z S Warwick
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Evidence for neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures.

Authors:  H T Lawless
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1979-06

7.  Using milk fat to reduce the irritation and bitter taste of ibuprofen.

Authors:  Samantha M Bennett; Lisa Zhou; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 1.833

8.  Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-05-02

9.  Optimization of Rabadi-like fermented milk beverage using pearl millet.

Authors:  Hiral Modha; Dharam Pal
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.701

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Just-About-Right and ideal scaling provide similar insights into the influence of sensory attributes on liking.

Authors:  Bangde Li; John E Hayes; Gregory R Ziegler
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.565

2.  Maximizing overall liking results in a superior product to minimizing deviations from ideal ratings: an optimization case study with coffee-flavored milk.

Authors:  Bangde Li; John E Hayes; Gregory R Ziegler
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.565

3.  Optimization of Manufacturing Conditions for Improving Storage Stability of Coffee-Supplemented Milk Beverage Using Response Surface Methodology.

Authors:  Sung-Il Ahn; Jun-Hong Park; Jae-Hoon Kim; Duk-Geun Oh; Moojoong Kim; Donghwa Chung; Jin-Woo Jhoo; Gur-Yoo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Relationships between Intensity and Liking for Chemosensory Stimuli in Food Models: A Large-Scale Consumer Segmentation.

Authors:  Isabella Endrizzi; Danny Cliceri; Leonardo Menghi; Eugenio Aprea; Mathilde Charles; Erminio Monteleone; Caterina Dinnella; Sara Spinelli; Ella Pagliarini; Monica Laureati; Luisa Torri; Alessandra Bendini; Tullia Gallina Toschi; Fiorella Sinesio; Stefano Predieri; Flavia Gasperi
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-21

5.  Identifying aroma-active compounds in coffee-flavored dairy beverages.

Authors:  M M Chayan Mahmud; Russell Keast; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Robert A Shellie
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Effect of Antioxidant Addition on Milk Beverage Supplemented with Coffee and Shelf-life Prediction.

Authors:  Gur-Yoo Kim; Jaehak Lee; Seungtae Lim; Hyojin Kang; Sung-Il Ahn; Jin-Woo Jhoo; Chang-Six Ra
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2019-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.