Literature DB >> 20379768

What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research.

Kim Chivers Seymour1, Julia Addington-Hall, Anneke M Lucassen, Claire L Foster.   

Abstract

To systematically review and meta-synthesise primary qualitative research findings regarding family communication following genetic testing of cancer risk, in order to inform development of effective interventions. Systematic searches of CINAHL, Embase, Medline, British Nursing Index and PsycINFO databases were undertaken and relevant studies identified using strict criteria. The selected primary qualitative studies were appraised for quality and relevance by three independent researchers and then synthesized using a "Framework" approach. Fourteen (4.3%) studies met the inclusion criteria. The following factors influenced family communication following genetic testing for late-onset hereditary cancer: the informant's feelings about informing relatives about genetic testing; the perceived relevance of the information to other family members and their anticipated reactions; the "closeness" of relationships within the family; family rules and patterns (e.g., who is best placed to share information with whom); finding the right time and level of disclosure; and the supportive role of heath care professionals. The themes identified in this review could provide practitioners with a useful framework for discussing family communication with those undergoing genetic testing. This framework focuses on helping health care professionals to facilitate family communication. The next step will be the development of an intervention to directly support people in talking to their relatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20379768     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  40 in total

1.  Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems.

Authors:  M Dixon-Woods; R Fitzpatrick; K Roberts
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Communicating genetic test results to the family: a six-step, skills-building strategy.

Authors:  M B Daly; A Barsevick; S M Miller; R Buckman; J Costalas; S Montgomery; R Bingler
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2001-10

3.  Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands' perceptions.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Veronica Collins; Tiffany Symes; Jane Halliday
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The genetic epidemiology of BRCA1. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D F Easton; S A Narod; D Ford; M Steel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-09-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. I. Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium.

Authors:  W Burke; G Petersen; P Lynch; J Botkin; M Daly; J Garber; M J Kahn; A McTiernan; K Offit; E Thomson; C Varricchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Uptake of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genetic testing in a French national sample of BRCA1 families. The French Cancer Genetic Network.

Authors:  C Julian-Reynier; H Sobol; C Sévilla; C Noguès; P Bourret
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families II: impact on relationships.

Authors:  Aideen McInerney-Leo; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Donald W Hadley; Ronald G Kase; Therese R Giambarresi; Elizabeth Johnson; Caryn Lerman; Jeffery P Struewing
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Predictive testing for BRCA1 and 2 mutations: a male contribution.

Authors:  P A Daly; C Nolan; A Green; W Ormiston; N Cody; T McDevitt; B O'hIci; D Byrne; E McDermott; D N Carney; N O'Higgins; D E Barton
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; R Eeles; A Ardern-Jones; M Watson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Genetic testing for women previously diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer: examining the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searching.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles; V Murday; M Watson
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2002
View more
  65 in total

Review 1.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Genetic Test Results and Disclosure to Family Members: Qualitative Interviews of Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Ethical and Professional Issues in France.

Authors:  Diane D' Audiffret Van Haecke; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Milena Paneque; Liliana Sousa; Angus Clarke; Jorge Sequeiros
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Legacies and Relationships: Diverse Social Networks and BRCA1/2 Risk Management Decisions and Actions.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Allison Werner-Lin; Lindsey Hoskins; Jennifer Young; Jennifer T Loud; June Peters; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.818

5.  Unsolicited information letters to increase awareness of Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer: reactions and attitudes.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen; Charlotte Kvist Lautrup; Lars Joachim Lindberg; Steen Ladelund; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Family Communication in Inherited Cardiovascular Conditions in Ireland.

Authors:  Sinead Whyte; Andrew Green; Marion McAllister; Hannah Shipman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Laura M Koehly; Barry Graubard; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Selective sharing: The impact of patterns of communication in young people experiencing maternal cancer.

Authors:  Leonor Rodriguez
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-10-09

9.  Breast Cancer Survivors' Knowledge of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer following Genetic Counseling: An Exploration of General and Survivor-Specific Knowledge Items.

Authors:  Courtney L Scherr; Juliette Christie; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Evaluating the utilization of educational materials in communicating about Lynch syndrome to at-risk relatives.

Authors:  Kristen Dilzell; Kerry Kingham; Kelly Ormond; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.