Literature DB >> 29651783

Unsolicited information letters to increase awareness of Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer: reactions and attitudes.

Helle Vendel Petersen1, Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen2, Charlotte Kvist Lautrup3, Lars Joachim Lindberg2, Steen Ladelund2, Mef Nilbert2,4.   

Abstract

Dissemination of information on a genetically increased risk should according to guidelines primarily be family-mediated. Incomplete and incorrect information spread has, however, been documented and implies missed possibilities for prevention. In Denmark, the national HNPCC register has been granted an exception to send unsolicited letters with information on hereditary colorectal cancer and an invitation to genetic counseling to members of families with familial and hereditary colorectal cancer. To evaluate this approach, we investigated reactions and attitudes to unsolicited letters in 708 members of families with genetic predisposition and in 1600 individuals from the general population. Support for information letters was expressed by 78% of the family members and by 82% of the general population. Regarding route of information, 90% of family members preferred a letter to no information, 66% preferred information from the hospital rather than from family members and 40% preferred to obtain information from a close family member. Our results suggest that use of unsolicited information letters from the health care system may be a feasible and highly acceptable strategy to disseminate information to families at high risk of colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes towards unsolicited risk information; Direct approach; Dissemination of genetic information; Hereditary colorectal cancer; Reactions to risk information

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29651783     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-018-0083-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  34 in total

Review 1.  How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Milena Paneque; Liliana Sousa; Angus Clarke; Jorge Sequeiros
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Paul Atkinson; Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Rachel Iredale; Hazel Thornton; Joanna Dundon; Chris Shaw; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of Lynch syndrome: a complex diagnostic challenge.

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Stephen Lanspa; Trudy Shaw; Murray Joseph Casey; Marc Rendell; Mark Stacey; Theresa Townley; Carrie Snyder; Megan Hitchins; Joan Bailey-Wilson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Genetic counseling and cascade genetic testing in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Heather Hampel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  The Double Helix: Applying an Ethic of Care to the Duty to Warn Genetic Relatives of Genetic Information.

Authors:  Meaghann Weaver
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  Major contribution from recurrent alterations and MSH6 mutations in the Danish Lynch syndrome population.

Authors:  Mef Nilbert; Friedrik P Wikman; Thomas V O Hansen; Henrik B Krarup; Torben F Orntoft; Finn C Nielsen; Lone Sunde; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Dorthe Cruger; Susanne Timshel; Marie-Louise Bisgaard; Inge Bernstein; Henrik Okkels
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  How often do BRCA mutation carriers tell their young children of the family's risk for cancer? A study of parental disclosure of BRCA mutations to minors and young adults.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; James J Dignam; Comfort N Ibe; Sogyong L Auh; Fay J Hlubocky; Shelly A Cummings; Melody White; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Familial colon cancer syndromes: an update of a rapidly evolving field.

Authors:  Swati G Patel; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-10

9.  A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives.

Authors:  Joël Vos; Fred Menko; Anna M Jansen; Christi J van Asperen; Anne M Stiggelbout; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Uptake of genetic testing by the children of Lynch syndrome variant carriers across three generations.

Authors:  Toni T Seppälä; Kirsi Pylvänäinen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  7 in total

1.  Examining intrafamilial communication of colorectal cancer risk status to family members and kin responses to colonoscopy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kaitlin M McGarragle; Crystal Hare; Spring Holter; Dorian Anglin Facey; Kelly McShane; Steven Gallinger; Tae L Hart
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.857

2.  Public support for healthcare-mediated disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information: Results from a population-based survey in Sweden.

Authors:  Andreas Andersson; Carolina Hawranek; Anna Öfverholm; Hans Ehrencrona; Kalle Grill; Senada Hajdarevic; Beatrice Melin; Emma Tham; Barbro Numan Hellquist; Anna Rosén
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.857

3.  Room for improvement: One third of Lynch syndrome patients presenting for genetic testing in a highly specialised centre in Stockholm already have cancer.

Authors:  Sophie Walton Bernstedt; Jan Björk; Kaisa Fritzell; Allan D Spigelman; Erik Björck; Ann-Sofie Backman
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.857

4.  Healthcare professionals' responsibility for informing relatives at risk of hereditary disease.

Authors:  Kalle Grill; Anna Rosén
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  The Impact of Proband Indication for Genetic Testing on the Uptake of Cascade Testing Among Relatives.

Authors:  Tara J Schmidlen; Sara L Bristow; Kathryn E Hatchell; Edward D Esplin; Robert L Nussbaum; Eden V Haverfield
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Development of a Secure Website to Facilitate Information Sharing in Families at High Risk of Bowel Cancer-The Familyweb Study.

Authors:  Selina Goodman; Heather Skirton; Leigh Jackson; Ray B Jones
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  How to inform at-risk relatives? Attitudes of 1379 Dutch patients, relatives, and members of the general population.

Authors:  Lieke Marleen van den Heuvel; Daphne Stemkens; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Floor Willeboordse; Imke Christiaans
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.537

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.