Literature DB >> 26264439

How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence.

Álvaro Mendes1,2, Milena Paneque1,3, Liliana Sousa4, Angus Clarke5, Jorge Sequeiros1,3.   

Abstract

Supporting consultands to communicate risk information with their relatives is key to obtaining the full benefits of genetic health care. To understand how health-care professionals address this issue in clinical practice and what interventions are used specifically to assist consultands in their communication of genetic information to appropriate relatives, we conducted a systematic review. Four electronic databases and four subject-specific journals were searched for papers published, in English, between January 1997 and May 2014. Of 2926 papers identified initially, 14 papers met the inclusion criteria for the review and were heterogeneous in design, setting and methods. Thematic data analysis has shown that dissemination of information within families is actively encouraged and supported by professionals. Three overarching themes emerged: (1) direct contact from genetic services: sending letters to relatives of mutation carriers; (2) professionals' encouragement of initially reluctant consultands to share relevant information with at-risk relatives and (3) assisting consultands in communicating genetic information to their at-risk relatives, which included as subthemes (i) psychoeducational guidance and (ii) written information aids. Findings suggest that professionals' practice and interventions are predicated on the need to proactively encourage family communication. We discuss this in the context of what guidance of consultands by professionals might be appropriate, as best practices to facilitate family communication, and of the limits to non-directiveness in genetic counselling.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26264439      PMCID: PMC4755382          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  43 in total

1.  Concern for families and individuals in clinical genetics.

Authors:  M Parker; A Lucassen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Regulating the communication of genetic risk information: the Italian legal approach to questions of confidentiality and disclosure.

Authors:  L Battistuzzi; R Ciliberti; F Forzano; F De Stefano
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands' perceptions.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Veronica Collins; Tiffany Symes; Jane Halliday
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Communicating genetic information in families--a review of guidelines and position papers.

Authors:  Laura E Forrest; Martin B Delatycki; Loane Skene; MaryAnne Aitken
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information.

Authors:  Gillian Nycum; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Informing family members about a hereditary predisposition to cancer: attitudes and practices among clinical geneticists.

Authors:  Yrrah H Stol; Fred H Menko; Marjan J Westerman; Rien M J P A Janssens
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  The importance of written information packages in support of case-finding within families at risk for inherited high cholesterol.

Authors:  Hélène W P van den Nieuwenhoff; Ilse Mesters; Joyce J T M Nellissen; Anton F Stalenhoef; Nanne K de Vries
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Intrafamilial disclosure of risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: points to consider.

Authors:  Lee Black; Kelly A McClellan; Denise Avard; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-12-29

10.  Increased genetic counseling support improves communication of genetic information in families.

Authors:  Laura E Forrest; Jo Burke; Sonya Bacic; David J Amor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  25 in total

1.  Genetic Test Results and Disclosure to Family Members: Qualitative Interviews of Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Ethical and Professional Issues in France.

Authors:  Diane D' Audiffret Van Haecke; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Unsolicited information letters to increase awareness of Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer: reactions and attitudes.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen; Charlotte Kvist Lautrup; Lars Joachim Lindberg; Steen Ladelund; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Supporting disclosure of genetic information to family members: professional practice and timelines in cancer genetics.

Authors:  Benjamin Derbez; Antoine de Pauw; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Fred H Menko; Jacqueline A Ter Stege; Lizet E van der Kolk; Kiki N Jeanson; Winnie Schats; Daoud Ait Moha; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Disclosure to genetic relatives without consent - Australian genetic professionals' awareness of the health privacy law.

Authors:  Natalia Meggiolaro; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Kate Dunlop; Ainsley J Newson; Jane Fleming
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  From the laboratory to the clinic: sharing BRCA VUS reclassification tools with practicing genetics professionals.

Authors:  Bianca M Augusto; Paige Lake; Courtney L Scherr; Fergus J Couch; Noralane M Lindor; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-11-09

Review 7.  Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: A landscape analysis of reviews.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Anna Gaysynsky; Melinda Krakow; Ashley Elrick; Muin J Khoury; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Female family members lack understanding of indeterminate negative BRCA1/2 test results shared by probands.

Authors:  Deborah O Himes; Deborah K Gibbons; Wendy C Birmingham; Renea L Beckstrand; Amanda Gammon; Anita Y Kinney; Margaret F Clayton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  From older to younger: intergenerational promotion of health behaviours in Portuguese families affected by familial amyloid polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Carla Roma Oliveira; Alvaro Mendes; Liliana Sousa
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Genetic diseases and information to relatives: practical and ethical issues for professionals after introduction of a legal framework in France.

Authors:  Diane d'Audiffret Van Haecke; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.