Literature DB >> 15144764

Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer.

N Hallowell1, C Foster, R Eeles, A Ardern-Jones, M Watson.   

Abstract

The relationship between risk awareness and anxiety has been the subject of extensive theoretical debate and empirical research. Previous studies of women with a family history of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer suggest that both healthy at-risk women and former cancer patients report increased anxiety upon learning about their increased risks of developing these diseases. Indeed, anxiety about genetic risks has been reported as influencing decisions about DNA-testing and risk-reducing surgery on healthy breasts and ovaries. This qualitative study of women who had been treated for breast/ovarian cancer investigated their perceptions of, and reactions to, their genetic risks of developing further cancers following genetic testing (BRCA1/2 mutation searching). In-depth interviews were undertaken with 30 women (10 mutation carriers, 8 awaiting a result and 12 who received an inconclusive test result). Whilst the majority of women in all three groups adopted a fatalistic approach with regard to their future health and did not regard their genetic risks as a threat to self, a few reported heightened anxiety on learning they were at increased risk of developing a second primary cancer. The data suggest that affected women understand their genetic risks of cancer within the context of their previous disease experiences. It is observed that women's responses to their genetic risk are influenced by the degree to which they have accommodated their risk status in their biography following their diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15144764     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  28 in total

1.  Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people's understandings of cancer risk?

Authors:  Wendy L Lipworth; Heather M Davey; Stacy M Carter; Claire Hooker; Wendy Hu
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Evolution of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) for assessing social functioning in women in hereditary breast-ovarian (HBOC) families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Lindsey Hoskins; Sheila Prindiville; Regina Kenen; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Decision-making about inherited cancer risk: exploring dimensions of genetic responsibility.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Fiona Miller; Sonya deLaat; Brenda Wilson; June Carroll; Mario Cappelli
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.

Authors:  Louise A Keogh; Heather Niven; Alison Rutstein; Louisa Flander; Clara Gaff; Mark Jenkins
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-02-14

7.  Researching Experiences of Cancer Risk Through Online Blogs: A Reflexive Account of Working Toward Ethical Practice.

Authors:  Emily Ross
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the impact of genetic testing on self-concept in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  M J Esplen; N Stuckless; S Gallinger; M Aronson; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; J Stokes; C Way; J Green; K Butler; H V Petersen; J Wong
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  What's at stake? Genetic information from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members.

Authors:  Sara Shostak; Dana Zarhin; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Effects of genetic counseling for hypertension on changes in lifestyle behaviors among African-American women.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Y Taylor; Chun Yi Wu
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.