Literature DB >> 12215246

Genetic testing for women previously diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer: examining the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searching.

N Hallowell1, C Foster, A Ardern-Jones, R Eeles, V Murday, M Watson.   

Abstract

This study sought to investigate the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searching on women previously diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer. In-depth interviews were undertaken with 30 women who had undergone a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation search within the clinical setting. The main reasons reported for undergoing mutation searching were: to provide genetic information for other family members, general altruism, curiosity about the aetiology of cancer, and to provide information to facilitate risk management decisions. In the main, the process of undergoing genetic testing was not experienced as anxiety provoking. The benefit of receiving a result confirming the presence of a genetic mutation was seen as an end to uncertainty, whereas the costs included difficulties in disclosing information to kin and potentially increased anxiety about one's own or others' cancer risks. Women receiving an inconclusive test result reported a range of emotional reactions. There was evidence that some women misunderstood the meaning of this result, interpreting it as definitive confirmation that a cancer-predisposing mutation was not present within the family. It is concluded that women with cancer who participate in BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing need to receive clear information about the meaning and implications of the different types of test results. Some recommendations for clinical practice are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215246     DOI: 10.1089/10906570260199320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  19 in total

1.  Disclosing cancer genetic information within families: perspectives of counselees and their at-risk relatives.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Claudia Lampic; Richard Rosenquist; Karin Nordin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Enhanced counselling for women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing: Impact on knowledge and psychological distress-results from a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Kerry Anne Sherman; Suzanne Miller; Joanne Buzaglo; Mary Daly; Alan Taylor; Eric Ross; Andrew Godwin
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-04

3.  Is no news good news? Inconclusive genetic test results in BRCA1 and BRCA2 from patients and professionals' perspectives.

Authors:  Audrey Ardern-Jones; Regina Kenen; Elly Lynch; Rebecca Doherty; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.857

4.  When knowledge of a heritable gene mutation comes out of the blue: treatment-focused genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  B Meiser; V F Quinn; M Gleeson; J Kirk; K M Tucker; B Rahman; C Saunders; K J Watts; M Peate; E Geelhoed; K Barlow-Stewart; M Field; M Harris; Y C Antill; G Mitchell
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Men's decision-making about predictive BRCA1/2 testing: the role of family.

Authors:  N Hallowell; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles; C Foster; A Lucassen; C Moynihan; M Watson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research.

Authors:  Kim Chivers Seymour; Julia Addington-Hall; Anneke M Lucassen; Claire L Foster
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.

Authors:  J O Culver; C D Brinkerhoff; J Clague; K Yang; K E Singh; S R Sand; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  "Grasping the grey": patient understanding and interpretation of an intermediate allele predictive test result for Huntington disease.

Authors:  A Semaka; L G Balneaves; M R Hayden
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Colorectal cancer risk perception on the basis of genetic test results in individuals at risk for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Shilpa Grover; Elena M Stoffel; Rowena C Mercado; Beth M Ford; Wendy K Kohlman; Kristen M Shannon; Peggy G Conrad; Amie M Blanco; Jonathan P Terdiman; Stephen B Gruber; Daniel C Chung; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  "Nothing is absolute in life": understanding uncertainty in the context of psychiatric genetic counseling from the perspective of those with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Catriona Hippman; Zoe Lohn; Andrea Ringrose; Angela Inglis; Joanna Cheek; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.