Literature DB >> 11489038

Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems.

M Dixon-Woods1, R Fitzpatrick, K Roberts.   

Abstract

Qualitative research has been increasingly recognized in recent years as having a distinctive and important contribution to make to health care research. It is capable of being used as a methodologically sufficient approach in its own right, as a precursor to quantitative studies, during or after trials to explain processes and outcomes, and as a means of enhancing the link between evidence and practice. However, qualitative research has been little used as an evidence resource for systematic reviews. We argue that formal synthesis of both qualitative and quantitative forms of research is essential, and we discuss some of the problems that need to be overcome in carrying out such syntheses. These include methodological prejudice, problems in searching for qualitative evidence, and issues in synthesizing qualitative data. We call for progress to be made on the science and methods of including qualitative research in the evidence base of medicine.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11489038     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  46 in total

1.  Qualitative research in systematic reviews. Has established a place for itself.

Authors:  M Dixon-Woods; R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

Review 2.  Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research.

Authors:  Angela Harden; Jo Garcia; Sandy Oliver; Rebecca Rees; Jonathan Shepherd; Ginny Brunton; Ann Oakley
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  A systematic review of patient perspectives on surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Julia R Berian; Amanda Cuddy; Amanda B Francescatti; Linda O'Dwyer; Y Nancy You; Robert J Volk; George J Chang
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 4.  Low-income mothers, nutrition and health: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Pamela Attree
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Stigma in patients with schizophrenia receiving community mental health care: a review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Annelien Mestdagh; Bart Hansen
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Res Sch       Date:  2006

Review 7.  Phenomena associated with sick leave among primary care patients with Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aase Aamland; Kirsti Malterud; Erik L Werner
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 8.  Relationship between Organizational Culture and the Use of Psychotropic Medicines in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Integrative Review.

Authors:  Mouna Sawan; Yun-Hee Jeon; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research.

Authors:  Kim Chivers Seymour; Julia Addington-Hall; Anneke M Lucassen; Claire L Foster
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Community-based knowledge transfer and exchange: helping community-based organizations link research to action.

Authors:  Michael G Wilson; John N Lavis; Robb Travers; Sean B Rourke
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.