Literature DB >> 20375230

Evaluation of the C.Diff Quik Chek Complete Assay, a new glutamate dehydrogenase and A/B toxin combination lateral flow assay for use in rapid, simple diagnosis of clostridium difficile disease.

Susan E Sharp1, Lila O Ruden, Julie C Pohl, Patricia A Hatcher, Linda M Jayne, W Michael Ivie.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection continues to be a challenge for many clinical microbiology laboratories. A new lateral flow assay, the C.Diff Quik Chek Complete assay, which tests for the presence of both glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and C. difficile toxins A and B, was evaluated for its ability to diagnose C. difficile disease. The results of this assay were compared to those of both PCR and toxigenic culture. The results showed that this assay allows 88% of specimens to be accurately screened as either positive (both tests positive) or negative (both tests negative) for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in less than 30 min and with minimal hands-on time. Use of a random-access PCR for the analysis of specimens with discrepant results (one test positive and the other negative) allows the easy, rapid, and highly sensitive (100%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 89.6 to 100%) and specific (99.6%; 95% CI, 97.3 to 99.9%) diagnosis of C. difficile disease. The use of this algorithm would save institutional costs, curtail unnecessary isolation days, reduce the nosocomial transmission of disease, and increase the quality of care for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20375230      PMCID: PMC2884466          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00129-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  29 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a PCR method for detection of the Clostridium difficile toxin B gene in stool specimens.

Authors:  C Guilbault; A-C Labbé; L Poirier; L Busque; C Béliveau; M Laverdière
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Health care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Lorraine Kyne; Mary Beth Hamel; Rajashekhar Polavaram; Ciarán P Kelly
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Comparison of three commercial methods for rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B from fecal specimens.

Authors:  L Alcalá; L Sánchez-Cambronero; M P Catalán; M Sánchez-Somolinos; M T Peláez; M Marín; E Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Megan E Reller; Clara A Lema; Trish M Perl; Mian Cai; Tracy L Ross; Kathleen A Speck; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The emerging infectious challenge of clostridium difficile-associated disease in Massachusetts hospitals: clinical and economic consequences.

Authors:  Judith A O'Brien; Betsy J Lahue; J Jaime Caro; David M Davidson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Rapid and reliable diagnostic algorithm for detection of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Lukas Fenner; Andreas F Widmer; Gisela Goy; Sonja Rudin; Reno Frei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Rebecca U Manson; Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Ari Robicsek; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Lynne M Sloan; Brian J Duresko; Daniel R Gustafson; Jon E Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rising economic impact of clostridium difficile-associated disease in adult hospitalized patient population.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Song; John G Bartlett; Kathleen Speck; April Naegeli; Karen Carroll; Trish M Perl
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Is a two-step glutamate dehyrogenase antigen-cytotoxicity neutralization assay algorithm superior to the premier toxin A and B enzyme immunoassay for laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile?

Authors:  Peter H Gilligan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  36 in total

1.  Comparison of GenomEra C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile as confirmatory tests in a multistep algorithm for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Luis Alcalá; Elena Reigadas; Mercedes Marín; Antonia Fernández-Chico; Pilar Catalán; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Glutamate dehydrogenase for laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Simon D Goldenberg; Penny R Cliff; Gary L French
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard.

Authors:  Torbjörn Norén; Ingegärd Alriksson; Josefin Andersson; Thomas Akerlund; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Ellen Jo Baron; Lance R Peterson; David H Persing
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Modifications of commercial toxigenic Clostridium difficile PCR resulting in improved economy and workflow efficiency.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Dorothy Bilbo; Mary Paul; Maureen Napierala; Jeanne E Hryciuk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B rapid tests for Clostridioides (prev. Clostridium) difficile diagnosis in a university hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Authors:  Carolina Pantuzza Ramos; Emily Oliveira Lopes; Amanda Nádia Diniz; Francisco Carlos Faria Lobato; Eduardo Garcia Vilela; Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 7.  Laboratory diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Andrea J Linscott
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.

Authors:  Jari J Hirvonen; Silja Mentula; Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins and laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Shuyi Chen; Huawei Gu; Chunli Sun; Haiying Wang; Jufang Wang
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 10.  Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Masako Mizusawa
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.