Literature DB >> 32104159

Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile.

Karen C Carroll1, Masako Mizusawa2.   

Abstract

Clostridium (reclassified as " Clostridioides ") difficile is an anaerobic, gram-positive bacterium that causes significant disease through elaboration of two potent toxins in patients whose normal gut microbiota has been altered through antimicrobial or chemotherapeutic agents (dysbiosis). The optimum method of laboratory diagnosis is still somewhat controversial. Recent practice guidelines published by professional societies recommend a two-step approach beginning with a test for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), followed by a toxin test and/or a nucleic acid test. Alternatively, in institutions where established clinical algorithms guide testing, a nucleic acid test alone is acceptable. Nucleic acid tests are the methods of choice in approximately 50% of laboratories in the United States. These tests are considered as the most sensitive methods for detection of C. difficile in stool and are the least specific. Because of the lower specificity with nucleic acid tests, some clinicians believe that toxin enzyme immunoassays are better predictors of disease, despite their known poor performance in certain patient populations. This review will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the currently available test methods for the diagnosis of C. difficile with a brief mention of some novel assays that are currently in clinical trials. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; cytotoxicity; diagnosis; diarrhea; enzyme immunoassay; nucleic acid tests; toxigenic culture; toxins

Year:  2020        PMID: 32104159      PMCID: PMC7042017          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  103 in total

1.  Comparison of two commercial molecular assays to a laboratory-developed molecular assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Tess Karre; Lynne Sloan; Robin Patel; Jayawant Mandrekar; Jon Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Prospective multicenter evaluation of a new immunoassay and real-time PCR for rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Renate J van den Berg; Lesla S Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet; Hendrik-Jan Gerritsen; Hubert P Endtz; Eric R van der Vorm; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of two rapid assays for Clostridium difficile Common antigen and a C difficile toxin A/B assay with the cell culture neutralization assay.

Authors:  Megan E Reller; Romina C Alcabasa; Clara A Lema; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Impact of clinical symptoms on interpretation of diagnostic assays for Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke; Zhuolin Han; Linda Bobo; Tiffany Hink; Brenda Lawrence; Susan Copper; Joan Hoppe-Bauer; Carey-Ann D Burnham; William Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clostridium difficile testing algorithms using glutamate dehydrogenase antigen and C. difficile toxin enzyme immunoassays with C. difficile nucleic acid amplification testing increase diagnostic yield in a tertiary pediatric population.

Authors:  Kaede V Ota; Karin L McGowan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Performance of the TechLab C. DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C. difficile Tox A/B II EIA kit, the Triage C. difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Heather Snell; Meredith Ramos; Sue Longo; Michael John; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Multicenter evaluation of the Verigene Clostridium difficile nucleic acid assay.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Blake W Buchan; Sokha Tan; Paul D Stamper; Katherine M Riebe; Preeti Pancholi; Cheryl Kelly; Arundhati Rao; Robert Fader; Robert Cavagnolo; Wendy Watson; Richard V Goering; Ernest A Trevino; Alice S Weissfeld; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Diagnostic test accuracy of glutamate dehydrogenase for Clostridium difficile: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Arimoto; Nobuyuki Horita; Shingo Kato; Akiko Fuyuki; Takuma Higurashi; Hidenori Ohkubo; Hiroki Endo; Nonaka Takashi; Takeshi Kaneko; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Evaluation of the Xpert Clostridium difficile assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Saeam Shin; Minkyung Kim; Myungsook Kim; Heejung Lim; Heejung Kim; Kyungwon Lee; Yunsop Chong
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B rapid tests for Clostridioides (prev. Clostridium) difficile diagnosis in a university hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Authors:  Carolina Pantuzza Ramos; Emily Oliveira Lopes; Amanda Nádia Diniz; Francisco Carlos Faria Lobato; Eduardo Garcia Vilela; Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Prevalence and Seasonality of Clostridiodes difficile over 12 Years at a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.

Authors:  Adriane C Maestri; Paula K Ando; Gustavo Sarot; Fernanda de Castilho; Sonia M Raboni; Keite S Nogueira
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 2.343

3.  Biographical Feature: Karen C. Carroll, M.D.

Authors:  Erik Munson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Clostridium difficile: Diagnosis and the Consequence of Over Diagnosis.

Authors:  Helen S Lee; Kamryn Plechot; Shruti Gohil; Jennifer Le
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2021-03-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.