Literature DB >> 17926270

The emerging infectious challenge of clostridium difficile-associated disease in Massachusetts hospitals: clinical and economic consequences.

Judith A O'Brien1, Betsy J Lahue, J Jaime Caro, David M Davidson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the clinical and economic burden of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) in Massachusetts over 2 years.
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of Massachusetts hospital discharge data from 1999-2003 was conducted. Cases of CDAD in 2000 were identified using code 008.45 from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; patients were excluded if they had a hospitalization in the prior year during which a diagnosis of CDAD was recorded. Hospitalizations for CDAD during 2001 and 2002 were examined. For primary case patients (ie, those for which CDAD was the principal diagnosis), all inpatient costs were deemed to be related, whereas for secondary case patients, all-patient refined diagnosis-related group assignment, case severity level, and length of stay (LOS) were used to calculate incremental costs attributable to CDAD. Costs were adjusted to the national level and reported in 2005 US dollars.
RESULTS: The CDAD cohort consisted of 3,692 patients; 59% were women, and the mean age was 70 years. This group represented 1% of all patients hospitalized in Massachusetts in 2000 (96% of hospitals treated at least 1 case; range, 1-257 cases). Of patients who received a first hospital diagnosis of CDAD in 2000, a total of 28% were primary case patients; their mean LOS was 6.4 days, and the mean cost per stay was $10,212. For secondary case patients, the mean CDAD-related incremental LOS was 2.95 days, and the mean incremental cost per stay was $13,675 per patient. Of patients with CDAD who survived their index stay in 2000, a total of 455 (14%) had at least 1 readmission for CDAD within the subsequent 2 years (mean number of readmissions, 1.4 per patient; range, 1-7 readmissions), with a mean time to first readmission of 3 months. Over 2 years, a total of 55,380 inpatient-days and $51.2 million were consumed by CDAD management.
CONCLUSION: CDAD is widespread in Massachusetts hospitals. Rehospitalization with CDAD, if it occurs, generally happens within a few months and happens multiple times for some patients. Based on this study's findings, a conservative estimate of the annual US cost for CDAD management is $3.2 billion dollars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17926270     DOI: 10.1086/522676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  125 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients.

Authors:  Lynne V McFarland
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Development and evaluation of an ovine antibody-based platform for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  April Roberts; Joanna McGlashan; Ibrahim Al-Abdulla; Roger Ling; Harriet Denton; Steve Green; Ruth Coxon; John Landon; Clifford Shone
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 3.  Clostridium difficile in the ICU: the struggle continues.

Authors:  Linda D Bobo; Erik R Dubberke; Marin Kollef
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  A Call for Greater Consideration for the Role of Vaccines in National Strategies to Combat Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: Recommendations from the National Vaccine Advisory Committee: Approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on June 10, 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Profound alterations of intestinal microbiota following a single dose of clindamycin results in sustained susceptibility to Clostridium difficile-induced colitis.

Authors:  Charlie G Buffie; Irene Jarchum; Michele Equinda; Lauren Lipuma; Asia Gobourne; Agnes Viale; Carles Ubeda; Joao Xavier; Eric G Pamer
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Mapping interactions between germinants and Clostridium difficile spores.

Authors:  Amber Howerton; Norma Ramirez; Ernesto Abel-Santos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  A mixture of functionally oligoclonal humanized monoclonal antibodies that neutralize Clostridium difficile TcdA and TcdB with high levels of in vitro potency shows in vivo protection in a hamster infection model.

Authors:  Nicola L Davies; Joanne E Compson; Brendon Mackenzie; Victoria L O'Dowd; Amanda K F Oxbrow; James T Heads; Alison Turner; Kaushik Sarkar; Sarah L Dugdale; Mark Jairaj; Louis Christodoulou; David E O Knight; Amanda S Cross; Karine J M Hervé; Kerry L Tyson; Hanna Hailu; Carl B Doyle; Mark Ellis; Marco Kriek; Matthew Cox; Matthew J T Page; Adrian R Moore; Daniel J Lightwood; David P Humphreys
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-01-16

8.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Clostridium difficile virulence factors: Insights into an anaerobic spore-forming pathogen.

Authors:  Milena M Awad; Priscilla A Johanesen; Glen P Carter; Edward Rose; Dena Lyras
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2014

Review 10.  A review of the economics of treating Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Kari A Mergenhagen; Amy L Wojciechowski; Joseph A Paladino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.