Literature DB >> 20308100

Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications.

Wolfgang Stephan1.   

Abstract

The controversy on the relative importance of background selection (BGS; against deleterious mutations) and genetic hitchhiking (associated with positive directional selection) in explaining patterns of nucleotide variation in natural populations stimulated research activities for almost a decade. Despite efforts from many theorists and empiricists, fundamental questions are still open, in particular, for the population genetics of regions of reduced recombination. On the other hand, the development of the BGS and hitchhiking models and the long struggle to distinguish them, all of which seem to be a purely academic exercise, led to quite practical advances that are useful for the identification of genes involved in adaptation and domestication.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308100      PMCID: PMC2871815          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  67 in total

1.  Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach.

Authors:  Sascha Glinka; Lino Ometto; Sylvain Mousset; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inferring the effects of demography and selection on Drosophila melanogaster populations from a chromosome-wide scan of DNA variation.

Authors:  Lino Ometto; Sascha Glinka; David De Lorenzo; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 3.  A population genomic approach to map recent positive selection in model species.

Authors:  P Pavlidis; S Hutter; W Stephan
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Intraspecific and interspecific variation at the y-ac-sc region of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J M Martín-Campos; J M Comerón; N Miyashita; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Evidence of gene conversion associated with a selective sweep in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sascha Glinka; David De Lorenzo; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  59 in total

1.  Selective sweeps in multilocus models of quantitative traits.

Authors:  Pavlos Pavlidis; Dirk Metzler; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Limits and patterns of cytomegalovirus genomic diversity in humans.

Authors:  Nicholas Renzette; Cornelia Pokalyuk; Laura Gibson; Bornali Bhattacharjee; Mark R Schleiss; Klaus Hamprecht; Aparecida Y Yamamoto; Marisa M Mussi-Pinhata; William J Britt; Jeffrey D Jensen; Timothy F Kowalik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The evolutionary genetics of the genes underlying phenotypic associations for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae).

Authors:  Andrew J Eckert; Jill L Wegrzyn; John D Liechty; Jennifer M Lee; W Patrick Cumbie; John M Davis; Barry Goldfarb; Carol A Loopstra; Sreenath R Palle; Tania Quesada; Charles H Langley; David B Neale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Dynamics and Fate of Beneficial Mutations Under Lineage Contamination by Linked Deleterious Mutations.

Authors:  Sophie Pénisson; Tanya Singh; Paul Sniegowski; Philip Gerrish
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Selective Sweeps.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.

Authors:  José Luis Campos; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Frequent adaptation and the McDonald-Kreitman test.

Authors:  Philipp W Messer; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Whole-genome nucleotide diversity, recombination, and linkage disequilibrium in the model legume Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Antoine Branca; Timothy D Paape; Peng Zhou; Roman Briskine; Andrew D Farmer; Joann Mudge; Arvind K Bharti; Jimmy E Woodward; Gregory D May; Laurent Gentzbittel; Cécile Ben; Roxanne Denny; Michael J Sadowsky; Joëlle Ronfort; Thomas Bataillon; Nevin D Young; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.