Literature DB >> 15987874

Inferring the effects of demography and selection on Drosophila melanogaster populations from a chromosome-wide scan of DNA variation.

Lino Ometto1, Sascha Glinka, David De Lorenzo, Wolfgang Stephan.   

Abstract

Identifying regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome that have been recent targets of positive Darwinian selection will provide evidence for adaptations that have helped this species to colonize temperate habitats. We have begun a search for such genomic regions by analyzing multiple loci (about 250) dispersed across the X chromosome in a putatively ancestral population from East Africa and a derived European population. For both populations we found evidence for past changes in population size. We estimated that a major bottleneck associated with the colonization of Europe occurred about 3,500-16,000 years ago. We also found that while this bottleneck can account for most of the reduction in variation observed in the European sample, there is a deficit of polymorphism in some genomic regions that cannot be explained by demography alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15987874     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  75 in total

1.  Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Charles H Langley; Kristian Stevens; Charis Cardeno; Yuh Chwen G Lee; Daniel R Schrider; John E Pool; Sasha A Langley; Charlyn Suarez; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Bryan Kolaczkowski; Shu Fang; Phillip M Nista; Alisha K Holloway; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Yun S Song; Matthew W Hahn; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Population genomics in bacteria: a case study of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Shohei Takuno; Tomoyuki Kado; Ryuichi P Sugino; Luay Nakhleh; Hideki Innan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Evidence for a selective sweep in the wapl region of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Steffen Beisswanger; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Controlling the false-positive rate in multilocus genome scans for selection.

Authors:  Kevin R Thornton; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps?

Authors:  Kosuke M Teshima; Graham Coop; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Joint estimates of quantitative trait locus effect and frequency using synthetic recombinant populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stuart J Macdonald; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A scan of molecular variation leads to the narrow localization of a selective sweep affecting both Afrotropical and cosmopolitan populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  John E Pool; Vanessa Bauer DuMont; Jacob L Mueller; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Adaptive divergence of a transcriptional enhancer between populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Amanda Glaser-Schmitt; Ana Catalán; John Parsch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Evidence that strong positive selection drives neofunctionalization in the tandemly duplicated polyhomeotic genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Steffen Beisswanger; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.