Literature DB >> 23650353

Frequent adaptation and the McDonald-Kreitman test.

Philipp W Messer1, Dmitri A Petrov.   

Abstract

Population genomic studies have shown that genetic draft and background selection can profoundly affect the genome-wide patterns of molecular variation. We performed forward simulations under realistic gene-structure and selection scenarios to investigate whether such linkage effects impinge on the ability of the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test to infer the rate of positive selection (α) from polymorphism and divergence data. We find that in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations, MK estimates of α severely underestimate the true rate of adaptation even if all polymorphisms with population frequencies under 50% are excluded. Furthermore, already under intermediate rates of adaptation, genetic draft substantially distorts the site frequency spectra at neutral and functional sites from the expectations under mutation-selection-drift balance. MK-type approaches that first infer demography from synonymous sites and then use the inferred demography to correct the estimation of α obtain almost the correct α in our simulations. However, these approaches typically infer a severe past population expansion although there was no such expansion in the simulations, casting doubt on the accuracy of methods that infer demography from synonymous polymorphism data. We propose a simple asymptotic extension of the MK test that yields accurate estimates of α in our simulations and should provide a fruitful direction for future studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23650353      PMCID: PMC3666677          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1220835110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

Review 1.  Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The McDonald-Kreitman test and slightly deleterious mutations.

Authors:  Jane Charlesworth; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  A flexible forward simulator for populations subject to selection and demography.

Authors:  Ryan D Hernandez
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Recombination and hitchhiking of deleterious alleles.

Authors:  Matthew Hartfield; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Shifts in the intensity of purifying selection: an analysis of genome-wide polymorphism data from two closely related yeast species.

Authors:  Eyal Elyashiv; Kevin Bullaughey; Shmuel Sattath; Yosef Rinott; Molly Przeworski; Guy Sella
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Shmuel Sattath; Eyal Elyashiv; Oren Kolodny; Yosef Rinott; Guy Sella
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Evidence for hitchhiking of deleterious mutations within the human genome.

Authors:  Sung Chun; Justin C Fay
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Pervasive natural selection in the Drosophila genome?

Authors:  Guy Sella; Dmitri A Petrov; Molly Przeworski; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome.

Authors:  Adam R Boyko; Scott H Williamson; Amit R Indap; Jeremiah D Degenhardt; Ryan D Hernandez; Kirk E Lohmueller; Mark D Adams; Steffen Schmidt; John J Sninsky; Shamil R Sunyaev; Thomas J White; Rasmus Nielsen; Andrew G Clark; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  95 in total

1.  Selective Strolls: Fixation and Extinction in Diploids Are Slower for Weakly Selected Mutations Than for Neutral Ones.

Authors:  Fabrizio Mafessoni; Michael Lachmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Christian D Huber; Bernard Y Kim; Clare D Marsden; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  SLiM: simulating evolution with selection and linkage.

Authors:  Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The dynamics of genetic draft in rapidly adapting populations.

Authors:  Katya Kosheleva; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The characteristic trajectory of a fixing allele: a consequence of fictitious selection that arises from conditioning.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Martin Lascoux; Andrew D J Overall; David Waxman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Comparative population genomics: power and principles for the inference of functionality.

Authors:  David S Lawrie; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 7.  Effective models and the search for quantitative principles in microbial evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good; Oskar Hallatschek
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  Demography and mating system shape the genome-wide impact of purifying selection in Arabis alpina.

Authors:  Benjamin Laenen; Andrew Tedder; Michael D Nowak; Per Toräng; Jörg Wunder; Stefan Wötzel; Kim A Steige; Yiannis Kourmpetis; Thomas Odong; Andreas D Drouzas; Marco C A M Bink; Jon Ågren; George Coupland; Tanja Slotte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The evolution of selfing is accompanied by reduced efficacy of selection and purging of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  Ramesh Arunkumar; Rob W Ness; Stephen I Wright; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Intra-species differences in population size shape life history and genome evolution.

Authors:  David Willemsen; Rongfeng Cui; Martin Reichard; Dario Riccardo Valenzano
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.