Literature DB >> 22714406

Selective sweeps in multilocus models of quantitative traits.

Pavlos Pavlidis1, Dirk Metzler, Wolfgang Stephan.   

Abstract

We study the trajectory of an allele that affects a polygenic trait selected toward a phenotypic optimum. Furthermore, conditioning on this trajectory we analyze the effect of the selected mutation on linked neutral variation. We examine the well-characterized two-locus two-allele model but we also provide results for diallelic models with up to eight loci. First, when the optimum phenotype is that of the double heterozygote in a two-locus model, and there is no dominance or epistasis of effects on the trait, the trajectories of selected mutations rarely reach fixation; instead, a polymorphic equilibrium at both loci is approached. Whether a polymorphic equilibrium is reached (rather than fixation at both loci) depends on the intensity of selection and the relative distances to the optimum of the homozygotes at each locus. Furthermore, if both loci have similar effects on the trait, fixation of an allele at a given locus is less likely when it starts at low frequency and the other locus is polymorphic (with alleles at intermediate frequencies). Weaker selection increases the probability of fixation of the studied allele, as the polymorphic equilibrium is less stable in this case. When we do not require the double heterozygote to be at the optimum we find that the polymorphic equilibrium is more difficult to reach, and fixation becomes more likely. Second, increasing the number of loci decreases the probability of fixation, because adaptation to the optimum is possible by various combinations of alleles. Summaries of the genealogy (height, total length, and imbalance) and of sequence polymorphism (number of polymorphisms, frequency spectrum, and haplotype structure) next to a selected locus depend on the frequency that the selected mutation approaches at equilibrium. We conclude that multilocus response to selection may in some cases prevent selective sweeps from being completed, as described in previous studies, but that conditions causing this to happen strongly depend on the genetic architecture of the trait, and that fixation of selected mutations is likely in many instances.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22714406      PMCID: PMC3430538          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.142547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  41 in total

1.  The two-locus model of Gaussian stabilizing selection.

Authors:  Martin Willensdorfer; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effects of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a polygenic trait.

Authors:  Reinhard Bürger; Alexander Gimelfarb
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Searching for footprints of positive selection in whole-genome SNP data from nonequilibrium populations.

Authors:  Pavlos Pavlidis; Jeffrey D Jensen; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The hitchhiking effect on linkage disequilibrium between linked neutral loci.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan; Yun S Song; Charles H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Maintenance of multilocus variability under strong stabilizing selection.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; A Hastings
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.259

10.  Pleiotropic overdominance and the maintenance of genetic variation in polygenic characters.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  24 in total

1.  The evolutionary genetics of the genes underlying phenotypic associations for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae).

Authors:  Andrew J Eckert; Jill L Wegrzyn; John D Liechty; Jennifer M Lee; W Patrick Cumbie; John M Davis; Barry Goldfarb; Carol A Loopstra; Sreenath R Palle; Tania Quesada; Charles H Langley; David B Neale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rapid Adaptation of a Polygenic Trait After a Sudden Environmental Shift.

Authors:  Kavita Jain; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The efficiency of close inbreeding to reduce genetic adaptation to captivity.

Authors:  K Theodorou; D Couvet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Adaptive fixation in two-locus models of stabilizing selection and genetic drift.

Authors:  Andreas Wollstein; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genomic signature of adaptation to climate in Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Jeremy B Yoder; John Stanton-Geddes; Peng Zhou; Roman Briskine; Nevin D Young; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Uncovering the genetic signature of quantitative trait evolution with replicated time series data.

Authors:  S U Franssen; R Kofler; C Schlötterer
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Stability and response of polygenic traits to stabilizing selection and mutation.

Authors:  Harold P de Vladar; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection.

Authors:  Neda Barghi; Joachim Hermisson; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Response of Polygenic Traits Under Stabilizing Selection and Mutation When Loci Have Unequal Effects.

Authors:  Kavita Jain; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.